Experts clash on gays' bids to adopt children

Dueling social-science testimony marked a trial over a gay North Miami man's petition to adopt his two foster children.

The judge's ruling will determine whether a 4-year-old boy and his 8-year-old brother can be adopted by Frank Gill, the North Miami foster parent who has raised the boys for four years, and his partner. Lederman said she will decide on the adoption later this month.

Florida is the only state that bans all gay people from adopting. This fall, a Circuit Court judge in Key West declared Florida's ban unconstitutional, although the decision is ... Full Story »

Posted by Dale Penn
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dale Penn - Nov 17, 2008 - 9:18 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dale Penn - Nov 17, 2008 - 9:18 AM PST
Beth Wellington
3.7
by Beth Wellington - Nov. 18, 2008

I applaud the reporter for getting a copy of the transcript and reporting on this closed hearing. I would have liked a link to the transcript so that I could have had access to more than was provided in this article. I would have liked a summary of the legal grounds argued to reverse the law. (And to reverse the prior court ruling upholding the law--see Lofton ruling to which I''ve linked. ) I would have liked some statistics on gay adoptions in other states, but according to an earlier USA Today article (see link) state and federal governments don't keep such statistics. The census, however, has been studied by Gary Gates at UCLA, who found that "An estimated one in four same-sex couple households report children under age ... More »

The law, in banning all gays from adopting, does a disservice to both the potential parents and children and seems to violate the equal protection, relying on the "best interest of the child" standard for only certain segments of the population. I'm not sure what "fair" means in evaluating an article like this. The author has citing extensively from those who argued against gay adoption and provided a rebuttal. But can one be free from favoritism in covering material like this?

Gill, 47, never set out to challenge Florida’s controversial adoption law, which allows drug abusers and felons to adopt but imposes a blanket ban on gay people. But ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Derek Hawkins
3.7
by Derek Hawkins - Nov. 17, 2008

Thoroughly and fairly sets up the debate over same-sex adoption in a state that prohibits it. Strong, meticulously balanced trial reporting. Could have been broadened by seeking input from more people not involved in the proceedings. Otherwise well reported and detailed.

I feel like this bends over backward to give the flimsy statistics of the adoption opponents the benefit of the doubt -- perhaps out of necessity, this being a report largely on the trial itself and not just the debate.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Dan Kennedy
3.5
by Dan Kennedy - Nov. 17, 2008

The author does a reasonably good job of showing that two witnesses who testified against adoption by gay and lesbian parents are well outside the mainstream of accepted social science.

See Full Review » (10 answers)
Dale Penn
4.3
by Dale Penn - Nov. 17, 2008

This is a local case with implications for the entire state of Florida. It employs substantial information from both sides of the argument without editorializing. The depth of this local reporting is rare and should be encouraged.

As a gay father with a healthy, well adjusted straight son who was abandoned by his straight mother, I have a dog in this hunt. Good parents are generally good people regardless of sexual orientation, ethnicity or even religious background. The state's case, if portrayed by accurately by this article, seems very weak. Personal experience tells me there is only one decision for this judge to make.

See Full Review » (20 answers)
Chris Finnie
4.0
by Chris Finnie - Nov. 17, 2008

When the dissenting expert says the other guy cooked the data, it would have been interesting to have independent statistics presented to check the competing claims. Overall, Miller seems to have done a good job of presenting the two sides in the case and the overall context.

Gays and lesbians I know tell me they not only waited to have "normal" sexual leanings, but wanted to and even tried to in many cases. All come from heterosexual families and most have heterosexual siblings. They assert they were simply born homosexual and genetic and scientific studies seem to bear that out--a point Miller does not note in this story. Like the UCLA professor quoted, I notice that their family lives are very similar to mine, with the same joys and the same ... More »

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Michael Bugeja
4.3
by Michael Bugeja - Nov. 18, 2008

This enterprising reporter secures transcripts of a case in which gay foster parents want to adopt children but cannot, in that Florida law bans gays from adoption (although allows it for felons and drug abusers). While the topic is gay adoption rights, the theme is social science--which stands this report above others in that its in-depth look at the topic also does so from that perspective. The story hinges on testimony by two professors for the state: George A. Rekers, a retired professor from the University of South Carolina, who taught neuropsychiatry and behavioral science, and Walter R. Schumm, an assistant professor of family studies at Kansas State University. Other academics respond to their belief that children of ... More »

As a foster parent who adopted, I can attest that placement should be based on a case-by-case basis rather than on a cluster basis, especially when the latter focuses on the socially disenfranchised, for their psychological attributes may differ because of injustice rather than lifestyle or other stereotypical deduction on the part of critics.

Under cross-examination, Rekers, who also has a theology degree, acknowledged that he taught and practiced psychology from a Christian perspective, and had written books ... More »

See Full Review » (22 answers)
Fred Gatlin
3.7
by Fred Gatlin - Nov. 17, 2008

This is good article about experts for a trial to determine if a homosexual person can be an adopted father. This is a well written and important story.

A good article that makes it clear why our predecessors wrote our constitution to separate government and churches

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Veronica Barlee
3.1
by Veronica Barlee - Dec. 1, 2008

well-written article about the constitutional challenge to Florida's ban on gay adoptive parents. One major fault, the story quotes "experts", who oppose gay parents, as credible, and fails to note the lack of scientific credibility.

See Full Review » (19 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.8

Good
from 8 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.8
Facts
4.1
Fairness
4.1
Information
3.8
Insight
4.0
Sourcing
3.5
Style
4.0
Accuracy
3.3
Balance
3.3
Context
3.6
Depth
3.5
Enterprise
4.0
Expertise
4.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
4.3
Transparency
3.7
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
3.8
Recommendation
4.2
Credibility
3.4
# Reviews
4.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
2.0
More
How our ratings work »