Why Fox News Is Un-American

That Rupert Murdoch may tilt the news rightward more for commercial than ideological reasons is beside the point. What matters is the way that Fox's model has invaded the bloodstream of the American media. By showing that ideologically distorted news can drive ratings, Ailes has provoked his rivals at CNN and MSNBC to develop a variety of populist and ideological takes on the news. In this way, Fox hasn't just corrupted its own coverage. Its example has ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala - via Nicholas Kristof, MuckRack, Jay Rosen, Memeorandum, Newsweek

See All Reviews »

Review

Derek Hawkins
2.0
by Derek Hawkins - Oct. 20, 2009

Weisberg is clearly not a pot who knows his kettles. This petty little rant is no more factual or responsible than the Fox News content he roars against. Where are the examples that illustrate his assertions? Even though a lot of us know why we don't like Fox, we still deserve evidence. Worst is the charge that the news network is "actively try[ing] to kill its viewers" -- yes, Jake, even Fox viewers ultimately decide for themselves whether to get vaccinated. And for that matter, CNN and MSNBC can think for themselves, too. It's not Fox's fault they've become every bit as vapid and partisan as their competitor.

Most annoying and naive, to me anyhow, is the claim that the American press doesn't serve the interests of parties, persuasions, blah blah blah. Most mainstream media outlets, from Fox News to the New York Times, are stacked with power-worshipers and lap dogs. I find Newsweek is a particularly bad offender.

See All Reviews »

Derek's Rating

Overall
2.0

Poor
from 12 answers
Quality
2.0
Information
2.0
Insight
2.0
Style
2.0
Context
2.0
Expertise
2.0
Originality
1.0
Relevance
3.0
Responsibility
2.0
Popularity
2.0
Recommendation
1.0
Credibility
3.0
More How our ratings work »