Begich lead over Stevens grows

MARGIN IS 1,022 VOTES: With 24,000 ballots left, no one's getting excited.

The latest count shows Begich with 138,959 votes to 137,937 for Stevens. Alaskan Independence Party candidate Bob Bird is in third place with 12,144 votes, followed by Libertarian David Haase and nonpartisan Ted Gianoutsos. Full Story »

Posted by Ben Ross
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics
Topics: U.S. Senate
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Ben Ross - Nov 15, 2008 - 7:20 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Ben Ross - Nov 15, 2008 - 7:20 AM PST
Dale Penn
2.8
by Dale Penn - Nov. 16, 2008

A source for numbers of ballots outstanding to be counted is not provided, and this seems to be the crux of the story. There are 24,000 votes outstanding yet the opening statement in the article is "Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens is in grave danger of losing re-election after Mark Begich widened his lead to 1,022 votes Friday." This seems at odds with the story's subtitle: "MARGIN IS 1,022 VOTES: With 24,000 ballots left, no one's getting excited." All in all, average reporting.

The Stevens campaign has long gone silent, and once again Friday wouldn’t comment on the race. The campaign office in Midtown Anchorage was largely deserted. The ... More »

See Full Review » (19 answers)
Jack Dinkmeyer
3.0
by Jack Dinkmeyer - Nov. 15, 2008

A basic article which updates the Alaskian cliffhanger that will not be settled even after all ballots have been counted--due to an anticipated recount.

This mess promises to remain interesting into January. Republicans are desperate to ensure Democrats don't get their 60-vote filibuster-breaker. It looks like business as usual for Republicans--which may still spell disaster for the party.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Ben Ross
4.0
by Ben Ross - Nov. 15, 2008

Good detailed reporting.

I wonder if any stock taking on original reports of a Stevens victory will be aired.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.2

Average
from 3 reviews (30% confidence)
Quality
3.2
Facts
3.3
Fairness
3.3
Information
3.3
Insight
3.0
Sourcing
2.0
Style
3.0
Balance
2.0
Context
3.0
Depth
2.5
Enterprise
2.0
Expertise
3.0
Originality
2.0
Relevance
5.0
Transparency
3.0
Responsibility
3.0
Popularity
3.2
Recommendation
3.3
Credibility
3.5
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!