Obama's chance to end the fantasy that is Star Wars

The US has spent $160bn – only to increase the danger to itself and the rest of us

Sure, maybe one day scientists will discover some way to evaporate nukes in the brief window before they strike. Maybe they will discover how to turn lead into gold – a pursuit that obsessed Europe's best minds for centuries. Maybe aliens will get in touch. But none of these assumptions is a sensible basis for government policy. Full Story »

Posted by Chris Finnie
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Chris Finnie - Nov 13, 2008 - 8:12 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dwight Rousu - Nov 13, 2008 - 2:02 PM PST
Dwight Rousu
4.6
by Dwight Rousu - Nov. 19, 2008

Experts are not cited, but with the security levels of protection built up around this farce, it is very very hard to get experts on the record. Hari describes the situation fairly accurately, though not at a high-tech level. Hari identifies that the project is destabilizing and needs priority attention.

Offensive nuke missiles are cheaper than effective defensive systems by orders of magnitude; build a defense and they will overcome it. You may be able to hit a bullet, but which bullet will you aim for when there are decoys along with the nukes? Can you hit it if there is a high altitude burst to mess up your trackers? Even a hit nuke will spread dirty radioactive material all around the target zone. Nukes can also come in on ships and cruise missiles, where no missile defense ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Chris Finnie
4.7
by Chris Finnie - Nov. 13, 2008

Everybody seems to have advice for the incoming administration. Here's one more. With a lot of detail, it makes a good case for the proposal. However, Hari fails to note that a U.S. general in charge of this program has lately been telling the press we've been making technical advancements and it's important to continue the program. The reports I've read of his comments, however, fail to list the costs--both financial and diplomatic--that Hari does. And, as far as I know, Hari is right about the effectiveness of the system.

I know a physicist and engineer who worked on this project in the Reagan years. Both agree it will never and can never work. They called it "fatally flawed" scientifically and technically. The physicist explained it much the way Hari does, as a bullet hitting another bullet, but then went on to prove to me why it couldn't work. Considering this, and the current deficit, I have to agree with Hari.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Derek Hawkins
4.1
by Derek Hawkins - Nov. 13, 2008

The story that began with Reagan’s dementia-fantasies should end with Obama’s empiricism. This decision isn’t just about a bogus nuclear shield, ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Glenn LaBauve
4.8
by Glenn LaBauve - Nov. 13, 2008

Of the 3 editorial I pened in my ten years at The United Methodist Reporter, the one that drew the most response was one in which I sited all of points here, [lus the fact that almost every nuclear RV has contact crystals which will make it go full scale nuclear when impacted, so we are only moving the detonation, not stopping it, An above atmosphere detonation has many more problems, which were still classified at the time and had to be left out. We have known for many years that ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)
richard cortez
1.0
by richard cortez - Dec. 11, 2008

THIS IS HIGHLY BIASED LEFTWING REPORTING. THIS MAN SHOULD BE WRITING FOR THE PROPAGANDA ARM OF THE CHINEESE, RUSSIAN ,IRIANIAN GOVERNMENTS. THIS ARTICLE SHOWS VERY LIMITED UNDERSTANDING OF DEFENCE ISSUES. HE IS THE TYPICAL REAGAN HATER . GET A NEW REPORTER.

See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.0

Good
from 6 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.0
Information
4.4
Insight
4.3
Style
4.0
Context
4.2
Enterprise
4.6
Expertise
3.5
Originality
4.6
Relevance
4.8
Popularity
3.7
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
3.7
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!