Is Harry Reid Working The Inside Game For A Public Option?

"Reid and/or his staff has been in practically hourly conversations with a whole set of progressive players re how best to make sure we position ourselves to get a strong public option coming out of conference committee," said one progressive strategist, who asked not to be named. "He hasn't made any final procedural decisions yet RE how to get that done, but he's having really honest conversations [about] all his major options, pros and cons of each, etc. ... Full Story »

Posted by Jo Bobenhouse Smith
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Jo Bobenhouse Smith - Oct 16, 2009 - 7:29 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Oct 16, 2009 - 11:09 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Jo Bobenhouse Smith
3.2
by Jo Bobenhouse Smith - Oct. 16, 2009

This is an eager short look at the possible future of the public option.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Julia Willebrand
2.8
by Julia Willebrand - Oct. 18, 2009

More facts, less author opinion would have strenthened the piece. how about names of "intractable consevative democrats", "activists" for whom "Reid is a whipping boy". Blind quotes from "progressive strategists" does not a serious piece of journalism make. "

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Timothy Chambers
4.5
by Timothy Chambers - Oct. 16, 2009

Yes, it offers a sourced, fair look behind the curtain at Reid's office as he undergoes the task of reconciling the various Senate bills, some of which have and some of which do not have a public option. I feel it gave me good information on where Senator Reid, the key figure in this stage of the process, is leaning in terms of how he will try to reconcile the public option aspect of these bills.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.1

Average
from 4 reviews (46% confidence)
Quality
3.1
Facts
3.7
Fairness
3.7
Information
3.0
Insight
3.0
Sourcing
3.0
Style
3.0
Context
3.3
Depth
2.0
Enterprise
2.5
Expertise
2.0
Originality
2.0
Relevance
4.0
Responsibility
3.0
Popularity
3.1
Recommendation
3.2
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!