We've Seen the Future, and It's Unmanned

Every so often in history, something profound happens that changes warfare forever. Next year, for the first time ever, the Pentagon will buy more unmanned aircraft than manned, line-item proof that we are in a new age of fighting machines, in which war will be ever more abstract, ever more distant, and ruthlessly efficient. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala - via Tobie Openshaw (f)
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Diggs: 224 (as of 2010-11-15)
# Tweets: 55 (as of 2010-11-15)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Oct 15, 2009 - 9:20 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Oct 15, 2009 - 9:21 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Kaizar Campwala
3.5
by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 16, 2009

The author frames this technological advancement as an alternative to manned bombing and reconnaissance. In that light it looks pretty good. However, he utter fails to consider whether UAV's are being used where aerial force wouldn't have been used in the past.

I think he's right that UAV's are going to increasingly be part of warfare globally, for the U.S. military and others as well. It's eerie that all those kids playing violent video games are in a sense training to wage the future wars.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Dwight Rousu
3.3
by Dwight Rousu - Oct. 16, 2009

The story glosses over the moral questions of robot killing machines. It seems a part of the pornography of war.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
William Hughes-Games
2.8
by William Hughes-Games - Oct. 16, 2009

Yuk!!

As they say in the recuiting posters. Join the Navy, See the world. Meet lots of interesting people and Kill them. Now you can do it from a comfortable chair as if you are playing a video game but killing real people. What incredible progress. Remind me. Who was the bad guy in the cold war. Great name for the plane.

See Full Review » (5 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.2

Average
from 3 reviews (40% confidence)
Quality
3.5
Facts
4.0
Fairness
2.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
3.5
Context
3.5
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
4.0
Relevance
3.5
Popularity
2.3
Recommendation
2.0
Credibility
3.0
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!