Lindorff synthesizes the AP and NYTimes stories coherently, painting a good picture. However, he falls off course towards the end when he accuses the Bush Administration of being "pathological sadists" without providing any response on their part.

This completely one-sided article implies that the release of prisoners in other countries is proof of their innocence, and that the prisoners remaining at Guantanamo are like the ones who have been returned to their countries. The military viewpoint is minimized. All of the facts given check out, according to the two source articles.

This Op Ed Piece ties together two of NewsTrust's top rated stories for today. Well written and convincing in style. Specultive at points but that is what OpEd is allowed to do.

This is opinion with a vengeance. The parting question: Why are the innocents detained and treated so badly with the best techniques of psychological torture developed by the CIA over the past 20 years, is answered poorly. It could more likely be to test the effects of this treatment or establish precedence. Not to be read by individuals with high blood pressure because of the high level of national shame implied. So many more questions come to mind from writing this poignant.

So, not only will we continue to indefinitely detain people we know to be innocent or without intelligence value without either charging them or allowing them to challenge that detention, but now we promise to get tougher? Who's doing CYA and who is simply insane?