2 Rivals’ Plans on Fiscal Issue Add to Deficits

While both presidential candidates enter the campaign’s final week promising to be the better fiscal steward, each has outlined tax and spending proposals that would make annual budget deficits worse, analysts say, with Senator John McCain likely to create a deeper hole than Senator Barack Obama would. Full Story »

Posted by Chris Finnie
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics, Business
Topics: Presidential Election 2008, U.S. Budget, John McCain, Obama Administration, Taxes
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Chris Finnie - Oct 29, 2008 - 7:40 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Oct 29, 2008 - 8:18 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Kaizar Campwala
4.1
by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 29, 2008

A fair comparison of McCain and Obama's overall spending projections for the Federal government. The article lays out these issues with nuance, but is still quite accessible. Relies on multiple non-partisan sources.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Kristin Gorski
4.2
by Kristin Gorski - Oct. 29, 2008

Very solid article with precise statistics and experts quoted in comparing what Obama and McCain spending would be as president. Excellent context, helpful to see comparison side-by-side throughout the piece and to look at historic campaign promises and their actual follow-throughs. Informative.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Chris Finnie
4.0
by Chris Finnie - Oct. 29, 2008

Nothing surprising. Both candidates have long accused each other of not explaining how they're going to pay for their proposals. Turns out they were both right. No voter, I imagine, will be amazed by this news. Still, Calmes has done a good job of fairly laying out the promises and realities of each man.

I loved the quote from Leon Panetta about Bill Clinton discovering when he got into office that the money wasn't there for the things he'd planned.

See Full Review » (12 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.1

Good
from 4 reviews (40% confidence)
Quality
4.2
Facts
4.5
Fairness
4.5
Information
4.2
Sourcing
4.3
Style
4.0
Context
3.7
Depth
3.7
Enterprise
3.3
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!