Counterintuitive counterinsurgency

As the Obama administration debates whether to stick with the counterinsurgency strategy for Afghanistan, opponents point to that nation's flawed presidential election as a reason why this approach cannot work. Counterinsurgency is premised, they argue, on the presence of a legitimate national government that can win allegiance from local populations. Given credible allegations of rampant abuse in Afghanistan's August election, President Hamid Karzai's ... Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins - via NewsRack (Afghanistan), Memeorandum

See All Reviews »

Review

James Canning
2.8
by James Canning - Oct. 16, 2009

Major flaw in this piece is the author's assumption the "surge" in Iraq was both a good move by the US and a success; in fact, both assumptions appear to be false.

Prolonging the US military presence in Iraq, rather than making deals with Syria and Iran, was a colossal blunder by G W Bush, wasting hundreds of billions of US taxpayer dollars and denying the US the opportunities normal relations with Syria and Iran would have provided. No stability in Afghanistan will be achieved without substantial help from Iran.

See All Reviews »

James's Rating

Overall
2.8

Average
from 7 answers
Quality
2.6
Information
2.0
Insight
2.0
Style
4.0
Popularity
3.5
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
4.0
More How our ratings work »