This borrows a little too heavily from one of it's sources. Also I am suspicious of some claims. For example, weren't the 5,000 "rejected" given provisional ballots? Not enough depth to truly prove it's claims.

While this relies in large part on earlier reporting, it does add some recent facts--such as the number of voters turned away in early voting. This is a story that is largely being ignored in the U.S. outside of the New York Times. However, the report that the Democratic Party is ignoring it is incorrect. They have lawyers on the ground already and have been watching it for quite a while.

The article integrates other information and focuses on the possible effect of the voter disenfranchisement by typo. Kerry also had an "army of attorneys" and a lead in the polls and great confidence. But nobody told the attorneys to march, and Kerry conceded without a whimper.