Moonlight and Valentino

Why are the media so clothes-minded when it comes to Palin?

It's a story that gives the tired old dichotomies of Palin’s controversial candidacy (conservative politics versus liberal; street smarts versus book smarts; folksiness versus erudition; elitism versus Joe-six-packism; blah versus blah) a Pygmalionesque implication: that by bringing the outsider onto the GOP ticket and into the party’s echelons, McCain and his team have invited the common to infiltrate the exclusive, thereby daring—expecting?—the ... Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins

See All Reviews »

Review

Jim Lang
3.6
by Jim Lang - Oct. 24, 2008

I enjoyed the Fitzgeraldesque introduction but thought the writing went downhill from there. The too clever prose aside, the author effectively makes the point that there are more important aspects of Palin's candidacy to consider than the price of her wardrobe. That said, I believe that the author underestimates the impact of the message that the public receives from trivial, unthinking but seemingly hypocritical acts like Edward's $400 haircut.

The public's reaction to little unimportant acts of hypocrisy is not uniform -- instead each person's reaction is informed by the impression that person already has. For example, my reaction to Palin's $150K wardrobe might be, "see, I knew she was a phony" (although in reality I think it's more complicated than that). My reaction to Edward's haircut, though, was, "gee, I thought that he was smarter than that."

See All Reviews »

Jim's Rating

Overall
3.6

Good
from 12 answers
Quality
3.4
Information
3.0
Insight
4.0
Style
3.0
Context
4.0
Enterprise
3.0
Expertise
1.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
4.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
5.0
More How our ratings work »