Rating Agencies Draw Fire on Capitol Hill

(One) lawmaker read from a series of instant messages, sent by employees of S&P, in which one analyst said they would rate a deal even if it were “structured by cows.” In many cases, these ratings agencies assigned super-safe, triple-A ratings to structured products that later turned out to be extremely risky, and in some case, worthless. Full Story »

Posted by Walter Cox
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Walter Cox - Oct 22, 2008 - 1:03 PM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Oct 22, 2008 - 2:12 PM PDT
Walter Cox
4.2
by Walter Cox - Oct. 22, 2008

As the economic crisis unfolds, finally some attention is being paid to the central role played by ratings agencies whose names have for decades inspired trust worldwide--Fitch, Standard & Poor's and Moody's. As a culture of risk-taking took hold in the financial world, Triple A ratings were assigned to structured products did not deserve them and were subsequently sold worldwide. This article makes it clear why the United States is being blamed as the epicenter of a massive fraud that threatens our global financial system.

I find it truly amazing, outrageous even, that supposed experts played so fast and loose with the economic security of millions of people worldwide. Fraud, driven by greed--on the part of irresponsible borrowers, loan brokers, those who created "securities products," and ratings agencies--led to unprecedented abuses of trust that will haunt us for decades. NOT a partisan issue--the roots of this crisis span Democratic and Republican administrations and have involved Americans from ... More »

See Full Review » (21 answers)
Fabrice Florin
3.7
by Fabrice Florin - Oct. 22, 2008

Informative report about lax practices by credit rating agencies responsible for reviewing security deals, based on comments cited at a recent congressional hearing. These comments are alarming, to say the least, but I would have liked to hear more from independend experts, as well as from the rating companies themselves. Overall, a worthwhile report about an important topic, which is likely to get a lot more coverage in coming days.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Marsha Iverson
4.2
by Marsha Iverson - Oct. 22, 2008

This summary of the committee hearing is a 'must read' for those who didn't watch the whole thing on C-SPAN. What we learn is that the very agencies charged with accurately assessing the worth of investment products failed to live up to their responsibilities. Add this negligence--at best--to highly suspect practices, legislative support through removal of liability to financial firms, and you have the ideal formula for colossal collapse.

Kudos to Congressman Waxman and the Committee for pursuing their investigation of this issue. Would that they had been able to conduct this hearing, say, 10 years ago, so this entire mess could have been prevented through responsible policy and zealous oversight.

Henry Waxman, the California Democrat who is chairman of the committee, said Wednesday morning that the rating agencies began assessing complex securities without fully ... More »

See Full Review » (14 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
3.9
by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 22, 2008

Covering a side of a financial meltdown not well-covered elsewhere. Unfortunately, this piece is mostly reliant on Congressional testimony, and lacks much original reporting.

See Full Review » (15 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.9

Good
from 5 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.9
Facts
4.4
Fairness
3.8
Information
4.2
Insight
4.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
4.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
4.0
Context
3.8
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
3.2
Expertise
3.5
Originality
4.0
Relevance
5.0
Transparency
4.0
Responsibility
5.0
Popularity
4.1
Recommendation
4.6
Credibility
3.8
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!