I had a hard time with this piece mostly, because right off the bat, the authors misnamed our Treasury Secretary, calling him "Hank" instead of Henry. I don't believe it is common practice to call someone a nickname, or the wrong name all together, in a story about such a serious topic. This mistake made me much more critical of the rest of the story. I also felt it editorializing but placing emphasis on Paulson's quote referring to "healthy institutions." Since the premise of the article is about what makes a healthy institution, I felt like the emphasis was overkill and inappropriate. The bold and blue emphasized phrases continued throughout the story, seemingly critical of the two-page application for federal help, and Japan's "lost decade." That being said, I enjoy when articles ask specific questions to readers, then attempt to answer them. I thought it did a fair job of prodding at where this money is going, and what qualifications are needed to receive this federal assistance.