Americans Unwilling to Face Reality

It’s not as though no one saw it coming. Here’s the economist Michael Hudson, writing in the May 2006 issue of Harper’s magazine: “The reality is that, although home ownership may be a wise choice for many people, this particular real-estate bubble has been carefully engineered to lure home buyers into circumstances detrimental to their own best interests… . The bubble will burst, and when it does, the people who thought they would be living the ... Full Story »

Posted by Marsha Iverson

See All Reviews »

Review

Marsha Iverson
5.0
by Marsha Iverson - Oct. 19, 2008

MacArthur, publisher of Harper's Magazine, ties together the various threads of the global economic collapse, the American passion for quick financial success, and a dearth of responsible reporting, into a neat, ugly package wrapped with a gloomy ribbon of negligent media and an uncritical audience.

This detailed article is a mini-seminar in the most critical economic issue in 70+ years, and the political, cultural and media environment that each bear responsibility.

…why isn’t Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, the former CEO of Goldman Sachs, challenged on his slow response to the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac failures? The only serious critic I’ve found was interviewed in France’s Le Monde: Columbia finance Prof. Rama Cont argues that six months ago the bailout of the two mortgage agencies would have cost $100 billion instead of an eventual $400 billion to $500 billion. Who pocketed the difference, thanks to Paulson’s “indulgence” of his former colleagues? According to Cont, it was short sellers at Goldman Sachs and hedge funds. Meanwhile, where are the deep thinkers who might enlighten us in this hour of fear, including Karl Marx? Don’t laugh. Marx had much to say about the so-called “contradictions of capitalism” that bears re-reading today. Nothing he wrote is perfectly applicable to subprime mortgages and the derivatives crapshoot. But Marx’s understanding that unfettered capitalism, while fantastically productive, leads to instability by concentrating wealth in too few hands — that a mass-production/mass-consumption society is fundamentally incompatible with oligarchic control of wealth — is something even Rush Limbaugh could appreciate.

MacArthur brings complex economic theory, political manipulation, and media shortcomings to life in an easily understood lesson on the interconnection between politics, business, finance, and the socio-economic crisis we’re all mired in now. Clear thinking and good writing make complex issues understandable—we have only to find it, read it, and share it.

See All Reviews »

Marsha's Rating

Overall
5.0

Very good
from 14 answers
Quality
5.0
Information
5.0
Insight
5.0
Style
5.0
Context
5.0
Enterprise
5.0
Expertise
5.0
Originality
5.0
Relevance
5.0
Popularity
5.0
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
5.0
More How our ratings work »