The writer sought out a lot of information and made substantial links about the imams involved in the story with various organizations. You get the feeling that this tory is not over.

The columnist clearly has a biased view that leads me to question her sources and her statements. Without taking the time to research the organizations she cites, I must view her statements with a jaundiced eye. It's possible that the information she presents is fair and factual, but her gratuitous innuendos undermine her credibility. Here are a few examples: "The grounded imams incident....has been a public relations coup for the imams, their supporters and their claims that the group's only suspicious activity was saying evening prayers." Kersten's approach clearly implies that the imams' story is false, but her substantiation of her view is weak. The second paragraph makes vague reference designed to frighten: "...saying ... More »