Spinning a Web of Lies at Digital Speed

Experimental sites like newstrust.net hope to create ratings systems from authorities who evaluate news articles on a range of criteria, and are themselves rated by the raters. (One of my articles was vetted by four reviewers and received a 4 out of 5 in terms of accuracy from its four reviewers.)

Fabrice Florin, the founder of News Trust, said sites like his would be crucial to flagging inaccuracy, though he said, “we probably wouldn’t be as ... Full Story »

Posted by Fabrice Florin

See All Reviews »

Review

Marsha Iverson
4.3
by Marsha Iverson - Oct. 13, 2008

It is rare that journalists and media outlets point to information sources to exhort the public to hone their critical thinking skills. In this piece, Noam Cohen cites several critical examples of the damage done by inaccurate information--often deliberately spread by those who stand to gain from its dissemination. Journalists, news junkies, and even casual readers alike are well advised to apply stringent analytical standards and good common sense to evaluate "news," whatever the source.

As a NewsTrust reviewer/host, I take particular glee in having this project cited as an admirable source. But this is tautological--I became a NewsTrust volunteer because I believe it is an admirable project. The ready availability of information in this digital age demands that information consumers be able to differentiate fact from fiction. Projects like NewsTrust provide an excellent forum for developing, refining, and applying critical thinking skills.

“There is almost a short-seller mentality in the blogosphere,” he said. “We allow anyone to submit on a level playing field. We allow the digital democracy to be the fact checkers. There is definitely some risk to that.”

No matter the question, and no matter the source, it is always advisable to check it out. As one colloquialism says: “Who ya gonna believe…me or your lyin’ eyes and ears?” Trust your eyes and ears—and personal investigation and experience—and STILL check it out.

Disclosure: Marsha is involved in this story as a co-worker (review not included in overall rating). Help

See All Reviews »

Marsha's Rating

Overall
4.3

Good
from 14 answers
Quality
4.4
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Information
5.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
5.0
Context
4.0
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
5.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
3.0
More How our ratings work »