Massive Censorship Of Digg Uncovered

A group of influential conservative members of the behemoth social media site Digg.com have just been caught red-handed in a widespread campaign of censorship, having multiple accounts, upvote padding, and deliberately trying to ban progressives. An undercover investigation has exposed this effort, which has been in action for more than one year. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala - via Memeorandum, Digg, Patrick McDermott (t), Shakthi Sivanathan (t), Gian Antelles (t), George Moga (t), David K. Miller (t), Gil Sharon (t), Sirajul Islam (t), Yuni Iwata (t), avivao (t), David K. Miller (f), David Fox (f), Fabrice Florin (f), James Joaquin (f), Tshiung Han See (f)
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Diggs: 9781 (as of 2010-08-06)
Editorial Help
Jon Mitchell
3.7
by Jon Mitchell - Aug. 15, 2010

Well, this is a brand new kind of investigative reporting, but this is an important example. It's not because this is a fair news report; it isn't. It openly and obviously takes the side of the Digg administrators against these outed "Patriots," without considering the other side. It's important because it reveals the serious vulnerability of crowd-controlled sources of information. Screen names are outed, tactics are exposed, and a whole new kind of censorship is revealed. This article is written with a palpable left-wing slant, but it's clearly an investigative report, not an opinion piece. I had to classify it as news, but I gave it low marks for fairness. Aside from the partisan tone, this is a newsworthy exposé of a ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Sirajul Islam
4.1
by Sirajul Islam - Aug. 10, 2010

Well, a detailed report on Digg watching (and bashing) by special interest groups. I find the report well-researched, showing context, in-depth, and enterprising.

People admires when one writes things we know already. People get displeased when someone writes something we didn't know. This post divides us on political lines, but don't challenge the research findings. I'm really fraught to see the 'creed of journalism.'

See Full Review » (20 answers)
Warrior Wheatman
3.3
by Warrior Wheatman - Aug. 15, 2010

Eighter some fantastic great sleuth-work, or the creativity of a conspiracy theorist. While I totally trust his opinion, I wonder what inside information he’s holding onto; Reading into the material provided, gives instances, but leaves that certainty of trust and conspiracy begging.

I have found an extreme difference in cites, as if they were magnets for unbalanced biased rants or for a biased political perspective. Digg is a social network, like Facebook. All friends are perused and invited for a following. Newsvine will pay for the eyes you can bring to their ads. Comments to Huffington Post and Newstrust however, ask you to be fair and on topic, they seek a more journalist response.

See Full Review » (9 answers)
David Agnew
4.1
by David Agnew - Aug. 12, 2010

This presents 2 (?) years of investigation into a conspiracy by right wingers to game the Digg system. It begs the question of how prevalent such activity is, by ideologues of whatever stripe, commenting on news sites, etc.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Deborah Plummer
4.0
by Deborah Plummer - Aug. 8, 2010

Yes, it expanded my knowledge of what happened to Digg and the reason(s) it was important. It a way it's kind of funny: The right-wing conservatives must be very scared their messages aren't getting out nearly enough so they have to rely on scamming/lying/manipulating ....like the "facts" they share .... in order to get heard. This was a mind-numbing exploration of the facts. Wow!

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Dwight Rousu
4.6
by Dwight Rousu - Aug. 12, 2010

Conservative(sic) radical operations to subvert what gives the appearance of objectively rated news is a story that talks to the possible destruction of Newstrust and trust in any such a news site.

This is more subversive than the radical right outrightly buying new outlets, like Faux, but perhaps even more dangerous as the distortion is not branded. Can the email addresses and names of these culprits be shared among other such rated sites, to prevent them from being destructive?

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Preston Watts
2.8
by Preston Watts - Aug. 12, 2010

Sounds like the right wing nut jobs are learning how to use traditional leftist pincko tricks. It sucks its messy but it works.

See Full Review » (9 answers)
Moises Figueroa
4.0
by Moises Figueroa - Aug. 7, 2010

No, this is just Digg people informing and uncovering some groups using Digg.com as a window for their campaigns.

My question is, what else can we expect from this right wing decentralize GOP and Tea party members? Not everyone in the GOP is as this people but they are certainly a big proportion of them.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story (6)Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.0

Good
from 13 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.0
Facts
4.0
Fairness
3.8
Information
4.0
Insight
4.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
3.7
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
3.0
Context
4.0
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
4.1
Expertise
3.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
4.0
Transparency
4.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
4.2
Credibility
3.9
# Reviews
5.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

  • 'UnDugg' by Digg, Massive Fraud Queued

    Massive right wing conservative fraud is gaming the ranking system at Digg.com. Insiders at the site are actively burying any story they don't deem 'suitable', and any story ...
  • Investigation on Right-Wing Censorship of Digg Makes Huge Waves on the Internet | Pending

    Posted by Dwight Rousu
  • YouTube - Digg Corrupted By Right Wingers Pending

    Posted by Doug Greer