Lack of universal health care is a mass killer

In my 20 years of practice as a family physician, I have encountered dozens of cases where the main contributing factor to a person’s death was the lack of health insurance for most of their lives. Full Story »

Posted by Chris Finnie
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Diggs: 12 (as of 2009-10-05)
# Tweets: 21 (as of 2009-10-05)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Chris Finnie - Oct 5, 2009 - 10:10 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Fabrice Florin - Oct 20, 2009 - 12:45 PM PDT
Peter Henry
4.3
by Peter Henry - Oct. 20, 2009

This piece is not crap. Its point is stated in the title - many people die early due to unavailability of universal health care. It refers to "a Harvard University study ... which appears in the American Journal of Public Health" and to a previous finding from the Institute of Medicine which provide documentation for the claim. The referenced study was easy to Google - here is the link: http://www.pnhp.org/excessdeaths/health-insurance-and-mortality-in-US-adults.pdf The author, a medical doctor, asserts this figure is probably low, extrapolating based on her personal experience. Perhaps so but not exactly statistically valid!

See Full Review » (10 answers)
Dwight Rousu
4.3
by Dwight Rousu - Oct. 11, 2009

Richter combines a statistical study with her personal experience with uninsured patients. She supports the need for universal health care very well. I agree that single payer is the best solution, but she does not provide reasons why single payer should be preferred.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
2.6
by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 11, 2009

While I found the information about the Harvard study interesting, the ridiculous math performed at the end of the piece takes any credibility the writer might have had as a scientist.

See Full Review » (10 answers)
Chris Finnie
4.4
by Chris Finnie - Oct. 5, 2009

Based on personal experience of one physician, this is backed by a recent Harvard study. Short, but hard-hitting.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Derek Hawkins
1.7
by Derek Hawkins - Oct. 5, 2009

Unattributed nonsense. No way to verify who Tina, Russel, Vivian et al. are and whether they actually died of what the author says they did. Not journalism -- chicken soup for the sappy soul.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Fabrice Florin
2.1
by Fabrice Florin - Oct. 23, 2009

Dr. Richter's opinion piece crosses the line between good and bad journalism by making an exaggerated claim that seems unnecessarily provocative. While I don't doubt that the Harvard University study is based on sound evidence, I question the use of the term "mass killer" to describe the lack of health care coverage as a cause of death. People are dying from actual diseases or accidents, not because of their financial condition. If you follow the author's line of reasoning, a variety of other obstacles besides the lack of universal health care could have contributed to people's deaths. I also find the dubious math at the end of the article misleading.

I'm in favor of providing universal health care coverage to all Americans -- and someday, all world citizens. But I cannot condone yellow journalism to reach that goal. There are many more convincing arguments in support of this important cause.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Gordon Townsend
1.0
by Gordon Townsend - Oct. 5, 2009

Another opinion that has the analytical rigor of a 10 year old. It is always important to remember biases - doctors sell medical services and drugs for a living - that's what their business entails. 200,000 people die in hospitals due to poor hygenie practices - that's 4 times the fictitious 45k - does that mean we need more or less people in hospitals? Insurance does not make healthy or unhealthy people - their personal lifestyle choices do that. Insurance just subsidizes ... More »

See Full Review » (4 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.0

Average
from 8 reviews (62% confidence)
Quality
3.0
Information
3.1
Insight
3.0
Style
3.6
Context
3.3
Expertise
3.3
Originality
3.4
Relevance
3.7
Responsibility
3.1
Popularity
3.0
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
3.8
# Reviews
4.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

  • MSNBC Goes Into Astroturf Mode

    Remember back just a few short months ago - when thousands, if not millions, of Americans were protesting out-of-control government spending and other policies favored by ...
    Posted by Derek Hawkins
  • What We Would Have Told Obama

    (Video) Critics are upset that President Obama only invited supporters of his health care plan to his address to 150 doctors in the White House Rose Garden on Monday. Fox News ...
    Posted by Derek Hawkins
  • Excuses wearing thin for Obama, media pals

    Have you heard the news? President Obama inherited an economic mess from the Bush administration. You say that's hardly news? But it's been the message sounded over and ...
    Posted by Derek Hawkins
  • Why Fox News Is Un-American

    That Rupert Murdoch may tilt the news rightward more for commercial than ideological reasons is beside the point. What matters is the way that Fox's model has invaded the ...
    Posted by Kaizar Campwala