Debate Highlights Security and 'Understanding'

The mood here at the debate site -- admittedly irrelevant compared to the opinions of the TV audience at home -- was measured, even bored, throughout much of the evening. Unlike other major debates, there was no singular exchange, be it angry, humorous or otherwise, that the press seized on to define the night. Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics
Topics: Foreign Policy, Presidential Election 2008, John McCain, Obama Administration
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Derek Hawkins - Sep 27, 2008 - 6:57 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
James Staley
2.5
by James Staley - Oct. 1, 2008

Mr. Melber writes a short (too short) summary of the first presidential debate and summarizes the mood of the Oxford audience and that of the attending press. He joins the pathetic chorus of media members who cry that there wasn't a zinger or laugh-line they could seize on "to define the night" (while, as usual, ignoring the more important, rich substantive exchanges that could affect the lives of American citizens). Why do so many journalists ridiculously and superficially wish to reduce the debate winner to one who got off a memorable line? They have done it in prior debates and are always reductive and wrong to do so. That desire places them behind even the more under-educated viewers in terms of grasping the important points ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Patricia L'Herrou
3.2
by Patricia L'Herrou - Oct. 1, 2008

a representative summary of the debate by someone who experienced it first-hand. however, it is short, very short, too short to draw much conclusion from, with no references to any other people there, so we don't know any more about why or even whether or not the mood there was "measured, even bored, throughout".

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Derek Hawkins
4.0
by Derek Hawkins - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

2.9

Average
from 4 reviews (40% confidence)
Quality
2.8
Facts
2.0
Fairness
3.0
Information
2.5
Sourcing
3.0
Style
3.0
Accuracy
3.0
Balance
3.0
Context
2.0
Popularity
3.1
Recommendation
3.2
Credibility
3.0
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
3.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!