Three Times is Enemy Action

This is enemy action. This is a bullet deliberately fired into the economy by men willing to exercise their ideology regardless of the cost to taxpayers. Men who have every expectation that they can plunder the system again and again, while the public picks up the tab.

It may come as a surprise to the champions of deregulation, but nobody likes regulation. The restrictions that were placed on banks, S&Ls, and other institutions in the 1930s ... Full Story »

Posted by Chris Finnie
Tags Help
Stats Help
Number sourcesHelp: 5
Anonymous sourcesHelp: 0
Number viewpointsHelp: 1
Opinions as factsHelp: 0
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Chris Finnie - Sep 23, 2008 - 9:56 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Chris Finnie
4.4
by Chris Finnie - Oct. 1, 2008

Not exactly polished prose, but a wealth of detail on exactly how players in the financial industry have put the economy in the tank--again, and again, and again--for their own profit. Devilstower has marshaled an impressive array of detail on how they accomplished it. Well-researched and thorough for a very convincing argument.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Mark Pettit
5.0
by Mark Pettit - Oct. 1, 2008

This is a fantastic summary of the current situation on Wall Street. If you find yourself scratching your head about what is going on and how did we get where we are, this article will help you understand.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Randy Morrow
4.3
by Randy Morrow - Oct. 1, 2008

This article looks at the actions of some of the players of the current meltdown (Gramm, Greenspan, McCain) going back to the '80s. It illustrates that the judgment exercised in the various schemes was that of ideologue plunderers.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Roland F. Hirsch
2.6
by Roland F. Hirsch - Oct. 1, 2008

This opinion piece has considerable merit. It is a pleasant surprise to see the House Republican viewpoint on the bailout represented almost word for word on this left-wing blog! The author should have however attributed the viewpoints to the House members such as Eric Cantor who working on the issue, as well as to Senator McCain, whose views largely overlap with those presented here.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Valliappa Lakshmanan
4.6
by Valliappa Lakshmanan - Oct. 1, 2008

A polemic, but provides a lot of context. Points to history to explain why an unregulated free market will always be a bad idea.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Janine Connor
5.0
by Janine Connor - Oct. 1, 2008

I thought this was an excellent piece giving a complete picture of how we arrived at where we are today. It is well thought out, well written and understandable for the layman. It is factual and articulate and a wealth of information. Lays out, and I thought, substantiated his argument.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.3

Good
from 8 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.4
Facts
3.3
Fairness
4.4
Information
4.6
Sourcing
3.4
Style
3.3
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
3.0
Context
4.7
Popularity
3.8
Recommendation
4.2
Credibility
3.5
# Reviews
4.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!