U.S., Iranian officials meet one-on-one during nuclear talks

U.S. and Iranian officials held a rare one-on-one meeting today as major powers convened near Geneva to try to negotiate an end to Tehran's disputed nuclear program. Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins - via Publish2 (World)
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Tweets: 2 (as of 2009-10-01)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Derek Hawkins - Oct 1, 2009 - 7:51 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Derek Hawkins - Oct 1, 2009 - 10:13 AM PDT
Derek Hawkins
3.5
by Derek Hawkins - Oct. 1, 2009
See Full Review » (2 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
3.4
by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 1, 2009

Not much here. It would be so much more interesting and informative if we were given an idea of what Iranians think about the nuclear issue.

Among the dishes served were: Trout almondine, cold sablefish, assorted cheeses and meats and salads including rice with olives, potato, carrot and tomato. Dessert included ... More »

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Manfred Ostrowski
4.5
by Manfred Ostrowski - Oct. 2, 2009

This article offers sufficient and satisfying information about the Geneva talks between major world powers and Iran. I consider this a straightforward and credible account of high quality.

I hope talks will continue until some agreement is reached.

Today’s meeting was a constructive beginning but it must be followed with constructive action by the Iranian government. More »

See Full Review » (8 answers)
James Canning
4.0
by James Canning - Oct. 1, 2009

Good story, but it would have been stronger if it had made clear whether the issue was any enrichment of uranium by Iran (allowed by NPT to 5% or less purity), or enrichment adequately overseen by the IAEA. The Natanz facility is monitored 24 hrs a day, 7 days a week, so no diversion of nuclear materials is possible without the IAEA becoming aware.

Obama should make clear Iran has rights under the NPT, and the issue is adequate transparency. He should openly note that Israel is not a party to the NPT.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.7

Good
from 4 reviews (57% confidence)
Quality
3.7
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
3.0
Context
3.0
Depth
2.0
Enterprise
3.0
Relevance
4.0
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
4.2
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!