Going with the Gut

So there's been a lot of talk about how John McCain's choice of Sarah Palin for VP demonstrates the danger of trusting your instincts and making important decisions with your gut. But I think such a conclusion is unfair - not to McCain, but to our very own brain.

After all, one of the major findings of neuroscience in the last decade or so has been the tremendous power of the emotional mind. The unconscious, long derided as a Freudian underworld, ... Full Story »

Posted by Leo Romero
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Leo Romero - Sep 7, 2008 - 7:49 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Fabrice Florin - Sep 7, 2008 - 1:05 PM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Dwight Rousu
3.3
by Dwight Rousu - Oct. 1, 2008

The experiments that Lehrer explores are interesting, but not entirely relevant. Buying a car and leading the world are tasks of a different nature and magnitude. The experiments reflect the performance of average subjects. The very purpose of vettings and primaries and debates and elections is to uncover the people with the best judgment and leadership skills, not to revert to the mean. The framing also ignores the news stories that Palin was picked by party bosses over the objections and preferences of McCain, and that is a bigger story.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Leo Romero
3.5
by Leo Romero - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Roland F. Hirsch
1.1
by Roland F. Hirsch - Oct. 1, 2008

This opinion piece has minimal journalistic merit. Why is McCain mentioned and not Obama? Obama after all bungled his VP choice, at the very last minute choosing an aged Senator with no executive experience, when outstanding governors such as Phil Bredesen and Kathleen Sibelius were available. McCain at least chose someone with serious executive experience. Thus the partisan bias of the piece warrants its low rating.

See Full Review » (13 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

2.3

Poor
from 3 reviews (30% confidence)
Quality
2.2
Facts
2.5
Fairness
2.0
Information
2.5
Sourcing
2.5
Style
2.0
Accuracy
2.5
Balance
2.0
Context
2.0
Popularity
2.6
Recommendation
2.3
Credibility
2.5
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!