Mortgage Giant Overstated the Size of Its Capital Base

The government's planned takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, expected to be announced on Sunday, came together after advisers poring over the companies' books for the Treasury Department concluded that Freddie's accounting methods had overstated its capital cushion, according to regulatory officials briefed on the matter.

The proposal to place both companies, which own or back $5.3 trillion in mortgages, into a government-run conservatorship ... Full Story »

Posted by Leo Romero
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Leo Romero - Sep 7, 2008 - 6:19 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Tanya J. Maurer
4.6
by Tanya J. Maurer - Oct. 1, 2008

The most interesting and understated paragraph says Freddy Mac had made accounting decisions that pushed losses into the future and postponed a capital shortfall until the fourth quarter of this year, which would not need to be disclosed until early 2009. That suggests to me that rich white republican managers of Freddie may have been politically motivated to postpone the disaster news until after the election. I would like to see more on that question.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Dwight Rousu
4.7
by Dwight Rousu - Oct. 1, 2008

The subject is covered in more depth and balance than many of the other stories. The story omits much discussion of the motivation for the managers to push the limits of corporate greed, and also omits much discussion of the effects of the government failing to regulate the public business that they turned over to private greed motivation. The link to the scandals of Enron and others is mentioned, but not previous banking scandals such as Silverado. The effects upon other national treasuries is mentioned, but not the effect upon retirement portfolios of present and future retirees.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Leo Romero
4.0
by Leo Romero - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.5

Very good
from 5 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.7
Facts
5.0
Fairness
4.3
Information
5.0
Sourcing
4.3
Style
4.7
Accuracy
4.5
Balance
4.0
Context
5.0
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
4.2
Credibility
3.5
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!