Tuesdays with Rupert

Since buying The Wall Street Journal, Rupert Murdoch has talked freely with the author about his business, his family, and the future. (There was serious gossip, too.) It's an unparalleled look at the 77-year-old mogul, transformed by his marriage to Wendi Deng, yet utterly, unapologetically himself.

Here was the old man, in white shirt, singlet visible underneath, doing one of the same basic jobs he'd been doing since he was 22, having inherited the Adelaide News in Australia from his father. And he was good at it. He was parsing each answer. Re-asking the question. Clarifying every point. His notepad going. He knew the trade. Of how many media-company C.E.O.'s could that be said? This wasn't a destroyer of journalism--this was a practitioner. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Subjects: Business, Media
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Sep 3, 2008 - 8:26 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Derek Hawkins
3.4
by Derek Hawkins - Oct. 1, 2008

For all its fluid writing and interesting language and well-partitioned story line, this profile of Rupert Murdoch fell short of what I thought it could have been. More than anything, I thought it was entirely too deferential to this pro-monopoly media mogul. The author gives him too much leeway on certain issues -- most notably his stated desire to own not one but two of the so-called "big three" American newspapers. I detect not enough healthy skepticism. Sourcing is also astonishingly poor. Paragraph after paragraph I found myself anticipating new voices that never came. The last third or so of the story makes obvious suggestions and conjectures about Murdoch's death, which given his age might not be far off. This is coupled ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
4.0
by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.6

Good
from 3 reviews (30% confidence)
Quality
3.7
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Information
4.0
Sourcing
3.0
Style
4.0
Accuracy
3.0
Balance
3.0
Context
3.5
Popularity
3.5
Recommendation
3.7
Credibility
3.7
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
4.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!