The Big Tent in Denver

What the Democratic Convention Could Learn

[Disclosure: The is a post from the blog of a NewsTrust staff member.] It seems some of the more serious conversation on the future of the Democratic party in Denver this week--at least the progressive wing--might be taking place, not at the Convention or its associated events, but over at the Big Tent, a "new media center created by local organizations, national blogs, Digg, Google and YouTube." Full Story »

Posted by Barry Grossheim
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics
Topics: Presidential Election 2008, Democrats, Democratic Nomination, Obama Administration
Member Tags: media responsibility
Stats Help
Number sourcesHelp: 10+
Anonymous sourcesHelp: 0
Number viewpointsHelp: 10+
Opinions as factsHelp: 0
Derogatory wordsHelp: 2
Complimentary wordsHelp: 0
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Barry Grossheim - Aug 27, 2008 - 12:41 PM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Beth Wellington - Aug 27, 2008 - 9:04 PM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Betsy Taylor
4.3
by Betsy Taylor - Oct. 1, 2008

Once again Wellington has given us a well documented look at the real life conditions that determine the quality of journalism today. This on-the-ground, careful look at a) the struggling new spaces for new kinds of journalism outside the mega-, overcommercialized media and b) the Big Money drenched social spaces within the convention which shape the 'mainstream politics' where mainstream journalists, politicians & opinion-makers hobnob. She also puts the current scene into longer historical perspectives.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Barry Grossheim
4.0
by Barry Grossheim - Oct. 1, 2008

The author of this blog laments the lack of depth in the discussion of issues at the Democratic National Convention in Denver.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Kristin Gorski
3.8
by Kristin Gorski - Oct. 1, 2008

This eye-opening post contains detailed, well-sourced snapshots of what is going on at The Big Tent, the progressive un-convention happening in Denver on the environs of the DNC. TV and most mainstream media highlight the big-name speakers at the convention, and this post has further confirmed what many suspect: that voices within the Democratic party are not being heard by most of the U.S. and the world, not because they are not speaking, but because the MSM is not covering them. This blogger makes this case by including quotations and viewpoints from comedian/journalist Jon Stewart, CQ blogger Craig Crawford, and from a regular voter/private citizen (among others); by providing a wealth of links to other Web sites; and then ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Ann Wilmer
3.3
by Ann Wilmer - Oct. 1, 2008

It's nice to know that another working journalist is concerned about the crap that some of the better paid of our ilk pass off for news these days.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Chris Finnie
4.0
by Chris Finnie - Oct. 1, 2008

Wellington makes a case that the substantive discussions are not going on at the convention. And, unfortunately, she may be right. Certainly I'm not seeing many in the mainstream media. Hard to tell if that's the fault of the convention or the media. As always, she provides lots of quotes and links to sources. So I feel confident she's done her research, which is more than I can say for a lot of pieces.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Jeanne Roberts
2.1
by Jeanne Roberts - Oct. 1, 2008

Though advertised as an article about the "Big Tent", a media and activist site just across from the DNC and the Denver Convention Center, the article reads more like a blurb from a society magazine column and devotes a single paragraph to the actual Tent happenings. Three thumbs down.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Jason Johnson
4.0
by Jason Johnson - Oct. 1, 2008

Ah yes, more exposure of the charade that is the DNC.

See Full Review » (13 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.6

Good
from 9 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.5
Facts
3.7
Fairness
3.5
Information
3.9
Sourcing
4.4
Style
4.0
Accuracy
4.3
Balance
3.3
Context
3.2
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
3.8
Credibility
4.2
# Reviews
4.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!