The Truth About Russia in Georgia

TBILISI, GEORGIA - Virtually everyone believes Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili foolishly provoked a Russian invasion on August 7, 2008, when he sent troops into the breakaway district of South Ossetia. "The warfare began Aug. 7 when Georgia launched a barrage targeting South Ossetia," the Associated Press reported over the weekend in typical fashion.

Virtually everyone is wrong. Georgia didn't start it on August 7, nor on any other date. ... Full Story »

Posted by Roland F. Hirsch
Tags Help
Subjects: World
Topics: Europe, Russia
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Roland F. Hirsch - Aug 26, 2008 - 6:50 PM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Beth Wellington - Aug 27, 2008 - 6:59 PM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Dwight Rousu
3.5
by Dwight Rousu - Oct. 1, 2008

The historical presentation and viewpoint provide breadth to the claims and counter-claims coming from the region. In the presence of conflicting stories and propaganda, it is difficult to sort out the truth. Including here.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
James Canning
4.0
by James Canning - Oct. 1, 2008

This complex story should be read more than once. I suggest reading it together with "Countdown in the Caucasus" which is the Financial Times' timeline and analysis, in the FT Aug. 27th. An equivalent account, from the Russian/Abkhazian/South Ossetian viewpoint, would be welcome. This story does not include anything about the role of the US and Israel in arming and training the Georgian army, even though it was well known that Saakashvili intended to retake contol of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. In my view, Georgia was likely only to be able to retain nominal suzerainty, taking a cautious approach, before the recent disaster. It remains to be determined whether Russian tanks were already moving through the Roki tunnel when ... More »

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Walter Cox
5.0
by Walter Cox - Oct. 1, 2008

It really doesn't get any better than this. Those of us who have read and researched this story figured out its main currents on our own, but Totten's piece fleshes it out beautifully so that anyone can see what really happened. The story is not a pretty one. And it is clear that matters were mismanaged, by the West and by Saakashvili especially. But the record needs to be set straight: This was a set up, plain and simple, with multiple Russian provacations carefully calculated to ensure that Saakashvili would eventually fall into the Russian trap. Putin/Medvedev are on the offensive, and the sooner the world faces that fact the more appropriate our response.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
David Barber
4.4
by David Barber - Oct. 1, 2008

Taken together with the comments, this is a huge amount of information on the Georgian conflict. I am hesitant whenever one side is painted unequivocally good or bad, but the amount of ancillary information makes this a very interesting read.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Roland F. Hirsch
4.6
by Roland F. Hirsch - Oct. 1, 2008

This news report has very high journalistic merit. The author is one of the best informed American reporters on foreign affairs. He reports first-hand, from interviews with experts in Georgia and with soldiers, and provides an exact time line of the events, somthing that is missing from most pieces about the Georgia situation.

See Full Review » (13 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.3

Good
from 7 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.2
Facts
3.8
Fairness
3.6
Information
4.9
Sourcing
3.6
Style
4.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
3.5
Context
4.4
Popularity
4.7
Recommendation
4.9
Credibility
5.0
# Reviews
3.5
# Views
4.8
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »

Topics

(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!