Journalists and their good friends in the White House

It's actually difficult to find a news story of any significance that isn't shaped at its core by the incestuous, deeply affectionate relationship between the Government and the establishment media. Full Story »

Posted by Norman Farrell
Tags Help
Stats Help
Number sourcesHelp: 6
Anonymous sourcesHelp: 0
Number viewpointsHelp: 9
Opinions as factsHelp: 6
Derogatory wordsHelp: 0
Complimentary wordsHelp: 4
Editorial Help

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Derek Hawkins
4.3
by Derek Hawkins - Oct. 1, 2008

A stinging indictment of WaPo reporter Michael Abramowitz for his apparent friendliness with White House officials. Glenn Greenwald's piece is laced with strong examples of the danger of journalists being chummy with their sources. This is an excellent dig -- sure to be a lesson for journalists and an eye-opener for news consumers.

See Full Review » (10 answers)
Norman Farrell
4.7
by Norman Farrell - Oct. 1, 2008

Glenn Greenwald's recurring demand is for news people to apply adversarial scrutiny to information sources, particularly those involving government insiders. The Salon writer's reflective mirror of American journalism should be examined regularly. Is mainstream media able to do that objectively? Doubtful. Greenwald targets sensitive places and no doubt provokes defensive reactions. Here, his targets are broad but one is late NBC titan Tim Russert, whose malleability was appreciated and advantaged by the Cheney/Bush cabal. Greenwald reports that former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev accurately criticizes western media for partisan and inaccurate reporting in Georgia. Is there irony to be seen here? Will it be seen?

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Elizabeth White-Nadler
4.1
by Elizabeth White-Nadler - Oct. 1, 2008

This is a particularly appropriate opinion piece for NewsTrust's consideration. In this well-written and persuasive editorial, Glenn Greenwald makes a compelling argument about the appropriate relationship that should exist between government sources and the news media. The piece is strongest in its revelations about Tim Russert being manipulated by Dick Cheney. It is somewhat less effective in its use of Gorbachev's NYTimes editorial. Because what Gorby said supports Greenwald's argument, Greenwald used it without consideration of Gorbachev's agenda. Even at this writing, the facts about what happened in South Ossetia are unclear (a major piece appears in today's NYTimes). Nonetheless, Greenwald is absolutely correct, even ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Veronica Barlee
4.6
by Veronica Barlee - Oct. 1, 2008

another excellent column from Greenwald and a stinging indictment of MSM's cozy relationship with government and lack of independent reporting.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Jack Dinkmeyer
4.6
by Jack Dinkmeyer - Oct. 1, 2008

Finally! Someone like Greenwald really lays it out about how propagandistic journalism has and continues to work in America: first outrageous falsehoods were created then distributed to the '"watchdog press," which then published the Government falsehoods in full, and did so uncritically, without any meaningful investigation, examination, or skepticism -- not just for days, but for weeks, months and, in many instances, for years." But let's not think in the past tense. The concoction of damaging falsehoods continues today masquerading as McCain's "Straight Talk Express."

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Dwight Rousu
4.4
by Dwight Rousu - Oct. 1, 2008

The article addresses the role of journalism, motivated by the perception that big corporate media has become chummy with the administration and a part of them instead of being an investigative reporting function to inform our democracy. The most interesting point is that the big corporate media retains such a favorable and narcissistic view of themselves, ignoring all evidence to the contrary.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Roland F. Hirsch
1.8
by Roland F. Hirsch - Oct. 1, 2008

This opi9nion -piece has minimal journalistic merit. The author is ignorant about the near universal anti-Bush sentiment among White House correspondents and obviously has never seen a Bush press conference or even one of the daily press briefings at the White House. He has not read any of the academic studies of press slant and bias, every one of which demonstrates the favoritism for the Democrats by the vast majority of media outlets and reporters.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Floss Shahbegian
4.5
by Floss Shahbegian - Oct. 1, 2008

Greenwald's writes with accuracy and fairness. His critiques are very informative and timely. I was appalled with Abramowitz's puerile comments about his relations with the W.H. staff. This man wouldn't qualify for a high school newspaper. American reporters have become merely conduits for the government. They do not cover or investigate a story with any effectiveness. The U.S. media is controlled and run by corporations. This started over 40 years ago & with each decade their control has increased. Corporations have controlled our government as well. Our democracy has been tarnished. The worst is when the fourth estate doesn't do its job to effectively inform the public.

See Full Review » (13 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.1

Good
from 9 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.2
Facts
4.1
Fairness
4.1
Information
4.0
Sourcing
4.1
Style
4.1
Accuracy
4.2
Balance
3.4
Context
4.5
Popularity
3.8
Recommendation
4.3
Credibility
3.4
# Reviews
4.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!