No signs of Russia claim of genocide by Georgia in South Ossetia

South Ossetia's capital, Tskhinvali, slowly emerges from shell shock, but the damage doesn't appear to be on the scale Russia claimed...Russian officials have claimed that the city was flattened, comparing the wreckage to the Battle of Stalingrad during World War II. Leaders in Moscow have repeatedly used the term genocide, and spoke of thousands of corpses. Full Story »

Posted by Walter Cox
Tags Help
Subjects: World
Topics: Russia
Member Tags: annexation, ossetia russia
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Walter Cox - Aug 18, 2008 - 12:46 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Walter Cox
4.4
by Walter Cox - Oct. 1, 2008

This article reports from Tskhinvali, the South Ossetian city where Medvedev and Putin claim more than two-thousand people died in an act of Georgian "genocide," thereby necessitating the Russian invasion. Yet, once again, Russian credibility suffers as reporters who venture into the affected areas find no substantiation for such claims. This article reports that the damage in Tskhinvali appears more likely to have been the result of clashes between Russian and Georgian forces after the Russian invasion, which if true would invalidate Russian claims.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
James Canning
4.2
by James Canning - Oct. 1, 2008

This report captures well the depth of grievance felt by South Osetians in the wake of the failed Georgian attempt to crush the movement toward full autonomy (if not outright independence). Before the recent disaster, I thought there was a slight possiblity Georgia could "kill with kindness" the attempt to secede from Georgia. This would have required Georgia to forego joining NATO, and to rely on economic development and better relations with Russia. All that is history,as is made clear in this fine reporting from South Ossetia.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Jeff Clark
3.6
by Jeff Clark - Oct. 1, 2008

This story has two themes that taken together give some perspective on the situation in South Ossetia: 1) The attack on Ossetia wasn't nearly as bad as the Russians claimed; 2) but it was bad and the people are still suffering. The descriptions of the city and impressions of the people are valuable for presenting the human cost. The article also provides some historical and contemporary context re the independence of Ossetia.

See Full Review » (9 answers)
Kyra Troyan
3.4
by Kyra Troyan - Oct. 1, 2008

Yes, tried to give us information so we could understand what was going on there. Tried to give some history of the area. Used qualifyign words as "doesn't APPEAR" so as not to make a claim they couldn't substantiate.

See Full Review » (5 answers)
Ryan McDonald
1.4
by Ryan McDonald - Oct. 1, 2008

Here is a BBC clip from two days before 8/8 showing Georgians already fighting in south ossetia. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1f0_hGSUwk The official count isn't over 2000 as the LA Times article says, that was a preliminary estimate. Here are better numbers (1600 civilians) http://www.russiatoday.com/news/news/29005 Georgian peacekeeping troops literally stabbed russian peacekeeping troops in the back right before the main attack.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.4

Average
from 6 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.4
Facts
4.0
Fairness
3.2
Information
3.5
Sourcing
3.2
Style
4.0
Accuracy
5.0
Balance
3.5
Context
3.3
Popularity
3.3
Recommendation
3.5
Credibility
3.3
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
3.4
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »

Topics

(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!