Obama and the Politics of 'Presumptuousness'

the liberal media

in fact it is the Post's white house columnist who is the symbol:a symbol of a press core that has become almost as corrupted--morally and intellectually by Bush and company, as the government. in media as well as politics, americans need a change we can believe in Full Story »

Posted by Patricia L'Herrou

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Dan Kennedy
3.5
by Dan Kennedy - Oct. 1, 2008

A good analysis of the subliminal race campaign being used against Barack Obama, focusing on the now-infamous "presumptuous" column by the Washington Post's Dana Milbank. Its only shortcoming is that it was somewhat outdated by the time it was published.

See Full Review » (10 answers)
Chris Finnie
4.8
by Chris Finnie - Oct. 1, 2008

Alterman is spot on. The evidence he presents, while a small subset of that available, proves his points. The so-called "liberal" media is no more. Instead it is a wholly owned subsidiary of the big corporations that prop up the GOP.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Deborah Plummer
4.9
by Deborah Plummer - Oct. 1, 2008

A near-perfect capsule of what's happened to corporate media and the reason reporters like Eric Alterman, and alternative news sources like The Nation, are becoming more important to our knowledge basis. Hopefully, with writers like Mr. Alterman, intelligence won't be a disability anymore. Dana Milbank should be shamed off the Post but when FoxNews can win a lawsuit over the ability to lie to their viewers with impunity, there maybe no hope for corporate media and we'll be on our own to search for the truth. Eric Alterman and The Nation is a good place to begin the search.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Patricia L'Herrou
4.0
by Patricia L'Herrou - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (2 answers)
Norman Rogers
1.2
by Norman Rogers - Oct. 1, 2008

"limitlessly corrupt, pathologically dishonest and lawless presidency" would seem to fit Clinton better than Bush. This guy lives in his own fantasy world. His article is so partisan that it sinks into silliness. Why does he think a product of Chicago politics is so wonderful. Chicago politics actually are corrupt. And this guy is a professor of journalism!

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Jack Boatwright
4.7
by Jack Boatwright - Oct. 1, 2008

Alterman clearly lays out Milbank's abuse of selective quoting. Why hasn't the Washington Post issued an apology or a complete retraction?

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Clark Davis
4.2
by Clark Davis - Oct. 1, 2008

This couldn't have been written any better and Alterman and "The Nation" are about as good as it gets. I was stunned by what Milbank wrote and think a lot of other people were too. Alterman should have pointed how conservative the Washington Post is now although the Post and the New York Times and other formerly great publications have sunken to new lows as far as political news is concerned. Watergate would have never become a big story if these newspapers were like they are now and Nixon would have ridden out his corrupt and criminal administration. Every time I read the worlds "liberal media" I get a good belly laugh. The quasi fascists who own virtually all of the major media are disgrace to a free country, or maybe should ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.9

Good
from 9 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.9
Facts
4.2
Fairness
3.8
Information
3.8
Sourcing
4.0
Style
4.3
Accuracy
4.8
Balance
3.0
Context
4.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
4.2
# Reviews
4.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!