A Cut-and-Paste Foreign Policy

The discovery that John McCain's remarks on Georgia were derived from Wikipedia, to put it politely, is disturbing and even depressing -- but not surprising. Under the tutelage of the neoconservatives, who revealed their superficial understanding of Iraq both before and after the invasion, he favors bellicose grandstanding over strategic thinking. So why delve deeper than a quick Google search?

Worse still, neither he nor his advisers yet grasp ... Full Story »

Posted by Barry Grossheim
Tags Help
Subjects: World, U.S., Politics
Topics: War, Foreign Policy, Presidential Election 2008
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Barry Grossheim - Aug 14, 2008 - 8:59 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Barry Grossheim
4.4
by Barry Grossheim - Oct. 1, 2008

This post examines John McCain’s grasp of foreign policy, or lack there of, supposedly his strong point.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
James Staley
4.0
by James Staley - Oct. 1, 2008

Mr. Conason has written an informative, strongly argued opinion piece in which he argues John McCain's recent statements concerning the Russian/Georgian conflict show he is not ready for the responsibilities of the presidency despite his falsely alleged superiority over Obama in foreign affairs. Conason ignores McCain's Shi/Sunni confusion, his critically false belief that Iraq and Pakistan share a border, the devastating implications of a president who angrily and falsely claims Iran is training Al-Qaeda terrorists; instead he focuses on McCain's Georgian remarks derived from Wikipedia (that would have devastated any Democrat's presidential campaign) and his quote that Georgia was "one of the world's first nations to adopt ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Clark Davis
3.5
by Clark Davis - Oct. 1, 2008

Joe Conason is a very good writer and he he did make his point about John McCain and the people behind him. If a Democrat had used Wikipedia so blatantly, he or she would have been crucified by all the media, but once again McCain is given a free pass. The story shows that McCain and his handlers are indeed very stupid men and arrogant to boot. Or maybe just desperate to get their talking dummy to say something right away about the invasion of Georgia. I wonder if McCain had any idea where the speech came from and if he was a truly independent campaigner for president, he should have been outraged what his own people did to him. It was funny when McCain said in effect no country can invade another one with impunity. That alone ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.0

Good
from 3 reviews (30% confidence)
Quality
4.0
Facts
4.0
Fairness
3.7
Information
4.0
Sourcing
3.7
Style
4.0
Accuracy
5.0
Balance
3.0
Context
4.0
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!