Judge Bates Slams the Bush White House's Claims of Congressional Immunity

Why There May Be No Consequences for the White House, Despite the Clear Ruling

Without reaching the question of whether the president might claim executive privilege in this instance, Judge Bates issued a closely reasoned and detailed opinion legally slamming the White House's claims. The ruling is instructive. Not surprisingly, Georgetown law professor Marty Lederman, a popular legal blogger, openly praised the ruling, calling the opinion a landmark. Rather than rehash Lederman's on the mark analysis of the Bates ruling, I will ... Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu

See All Reviews »

Review

Dwight Rousu
4.1
by Dwight Rousu - Oct. 1, 2008

Dean examines a decision by a US District Court Judge that strikes down bush/cheney claims of immunity from testifying to congress. He points out that limitations of time and of congressional backbone remain to be played out to see if the judicial rejection of stonewalling is moot.

See All Reviews »

Dwight's Rating

Overall
4.1

Good
from 13 answers
Quality
4.1
Facts
3.0
Fairness
5.0
Information
5.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
3.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
4.0
Context
4.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
4.0
More How our ratings work »