Judge Bates Slams the Bush White House's Claims of Congressional Immunity

Why There May Be No Consequences for the White House, Despite the Clear Ruling

Without reaching the question of whether the president might claim executive privilege in this instance, Judge Bates issued a closely reasoned and detailed opinion legally slamming the White House's claims. The ruling is instructive. Not surprisingly, Georgetown law professor Marty Lederman, a popular legal blogger, openly praised the ruling, calling the opinion a landmark. Rather than rehash Lederman's on the mark analysis of the Bates ruling, I will ... Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dwight Rousu - Aug 11, 2008 - 3:15 PM PDT
Reviewed by: Dwight Rousu (review)
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Dwight Rousu
4.1
by Dwight Rousu - Oct. 1, 2008

Dean examines a decision by a US District Court Judge that strikes down bush/cheney claims of immunity from testifying to congress. He points out that limitations of time and of congressional backbone remain to be played out to see if the judicial rejection of stonewalling is moot.

See Full Review » (13 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.0

not enough reviews
from 1 review (10% confidence)
Quality
4.1
Facts
3.0
Fairness
5.0
Information
5.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
3.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
4.0
Context
4.0
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!