The Public Editor: Tuning in Too Late

New York Times by Clark Hoyt | Sep. 27, 2009 (Opinion)

By stressing the politics, the article irritated more readers. “A suspicious person might see an attempt to deflect criticism of Acorn by highlighting how those pesky conservatives are at it again,” said Albert Smith of Chatham, N.J. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala - via Jay Rosen, Google News (U.S.), Real Clear Politics

See All Reviews »

View

Review

Patricia Blochowiak
2.9
 by Patricia Blochowiak - Oct. 2, 2009

This story opinion claims to add perspective, but ignores the fact that the Right had been attacking ACORN for years before they perpetrated this sting.

See All Reviews »

Patricia's Rating

Overall
2.9

Average
from 18 answers
Quality
3.0
Facts
3.0
Fairness
1.0
Information
3.0
Insight
3.0
Style
4.0
Accuracy
3.0
Balance
1.0
Context
2.0
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
3.0
Expertise
4.0
Originality
2.0
Relevance
4.0
Transparency
5.0
Responsibility
2.0
Popularity
2.5
Recommendation
2.0
Credibility
3.0
More How our ratings work »