Fierce Fighting Continues In South Ossetia As Civilians Flee

Fierce fighting continues in Georgia's separatist region of South Ossetia, with Georgian and Russian forces battling for control of the enclave. Hundreds of civilians have been reported killed or injured after a second night of fighting, and major damage has been reported in the separatist capital of Tskhinvali. Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins
Tags Help
Subjects: World
Topics: War, Russia
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Derek Hawkins - Aug 9, 2008 - 5:31 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Derek Hawkins - Aug 9, 2008 - 5:35 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Elizabeth White-Nadler
3.5
by Elizabeth White-Nadler - Oct. 1, 2008

While most of this early information cannot be substantiated, it is worthwhile for RFE to have provided it as the situation progresses. This piece describes the claims of both sides and tells how the US and the UN have responded thus far (Bush strongly backed up Georgia and the UN threw up their hands and said "we don't know yet"). If the claims about bombing of civilian populations are confirmed, and the claims of ethnic cleansing are not, Russia is once again going to be the target of international condemnation for their invasion of the fledgling democracy. As news analysis, this report is badly lacking, but for timely reporting of immensely important events, it is very valuable.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Fabrice Florin
3.7
by Fabrice Florin - Oct. 1, 2008

Good reporting about a breaking news story that is still very confusing, with both sides making widely divergent claims. The report is presented fairly, based on factual evidence, citing multiple sources and helpful context. However, it doesn't appear that RFE has reporters on the ground yet, and they appear to rely largely on second hand information.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Derek Hawkins
3.5
by Derek Hawkins - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.6

Good
from 3 reviews (30% confidence)
Quality
3.6
Facts
3.5
Fairness
4.0
Information
4.0
Sourcing
2.5
Style
3.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
4.0
Context
3.5
Popularity
3.6
Recommendation
3.3
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »

Topics

(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!