The Justice Department's truthiness problem

Americans now have more confidence in the integrity and reliability of Post Office employees than they do in federal prosecutors and FBI agents. But is the Justice Department going to start coming to grips with its "truthiness" problem, or will it just plod along through inauguration day, 2009? Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins
Tags Help
Stats Help
Number sourcesHelp: 2
Anonymous sourcesHelp: 0
Number viewpointsHelp: 2
Opinions as factsHelp: 0
Number stakeholdersHelp: 10+
Stakeholders quotedHelp: 0
Derogatory wordsHelp: 0
Complimentary wordsHelp: 2
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Derek Hawkins - Aug 9, 2008 - 5:11 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Tom Maertens
4.5
by Tom Maertens - Oct. 1, 2008

Horton has done an excellent job of recounting the history of the Bush administration's politicization of the Justice Dept. There are any number of additional facts that could be cited, but this is a blog piece, not a novel. The open question is whether Rove and others will pay any price at all for what they've done. Mukasey obviously won't enforce the law, and the Democrats seem unwilling (except for Henry Waxman and John Conyers) to take any serious measures to hold the Bush administration accountable. Among other things, the House Dems control the budget and haven't made the slightest effort to use the power of the purse to enforce their subpoenas.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Fred Gatlin
4.8
by Fred Gatlin - Oct. 1, 2008

This is an excellent opinion article. It describes the continuing issues of the Justice Department. I have read a number of stories about this issue, but this is the most complete article on this subject I have read.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Francis Lilly
4.2
by Francis Lilly - Oct. 1, 2008

Excellent op-ed that presents Mr. Horton's case against the justice department's integrity via a preponderance of verifiable accounts of subversion of the American justice processes. (I claim they are verifiable based on my personal and avid c-span veiwing of committee probes on many current issues, in which those who do not give the finger to the subpoena process, yet volunteer to testify do so under oath and have confirmed Mr. Horton's assertions.) Balance is not intended. I rated fairness based on Mr. Horton's evidence. truthful but not truthiness. Space permits only the one issue (subversion of the U.S. Attorney system)to be addressed. For this reason, I rate context lower because the Justice Department truthiness issue is a ... More »

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Derek Hawkins
4.5
by Derek Hawkins - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Roy Streit
4.7
by Roy Streit - Oct. 1, 2008

Litte to add. Horton does his usual excellent job. Impeachment of Mukasey should be a priority.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Floss Shahbegian
4.6
by Floss Shahbegian - Oct. 1, 2008

Very much good journalism. He has given a very complete picture of all the distortions we have been subjected to in the past 7 years. This article is concise, thorough & overwhelming in its facts. Despite thinking you know a lot about this subject, the facts presented set the alarms off in your mind. We need more of this type of honest & factual reporting. People need to be informed with the clear and straightforward delivery of the facts.

See Full Review » (13 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.4

Good
from 8 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.4
Facts
4.3
Fairness
4.1
Information
4.6
Sourcing
4.1
Style
4.7
Accuracy
5.0
Balance
3.5
Context
4.3
Popularity
4.4
Recommendation
4.6
Credibility
4.4
# Reviews
4.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!