Global Trade Talks Fail As New Giants Flex Muscle

A seven-year effort to forge a new global trade pact collapsed over farm tariffs Tuesday, reflecting a dramatic shift in the influence and the interests of trading powerhouses China, India and Brazil. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Jul 30, 2008 - 8:35 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Fabrice Florin - Aug 6, 2008 - 11:42 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Fabrice Florin
3.8
by Fabrice Florin - Oct. 1, 2008

Informative article about the failure by WTO negotiators to reach an agreement over farm tariffs -- originally intended to benefit farmers in poor countries by giving them greater access to wealthy markets. This report provides useful factual evidence, cites multiple sources familiar with the trades summit, and offers important context to put it in perspective.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Jack Dinkmeyer
4.1
by Jack Dinkmeyer - Oct. 1, 2008

The article explores the reasons for the failure of the Global Trade Talks from several viewpoints in this era of cursory 30-second overviews by corporate and cable news media. U.S. Trade Rep Susan Schwab bemoaned the failure in face of rising global food shortages: "it's unconscionable that this came down to how much countries could raise their barriers to imports of food." Implicit in this failure is an even bigger question: is this really about food,? Or about the bigger question of emerging sovereignty of the next world powers?

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Ben Ross
3.6
by Ben Ross - Oct. 1, 2008

good ....interested and probing look at the real time negotiations... Put these guys in charge of the entire paper...ie editorial page!

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
4.2
by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.9

Good
from 4 reviews (40% confidence)
Quality
3.9
Facts
4.3
Fairness
4.0
Information
4.0
Sourcing
3.8
Style
3.7
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
4.0
Context
3.8
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
3.8
Credibility
4.2
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!