Dire Predictions: Understanding Global Warming

Let's say you're a preeminent paleo-climate researcher who's been widely recognized for groundbreaking, dramatic work. Your reward from the usual suspects is to be attacked, shamelessly misrepresented, dragged through several legislative circuses with decidedly mixed receptions. At times openly harressed by world class industry whores, forced to appear beside Michael Crichton of all people, while antiscience ideologues eagerly take turns metaphorically ... Full Story »

Posted by Leo Romero
Tags Help
Subjects: World, Politics, Sci/Tech
Topics: Global Warming, Climate Change
Stats Help
Number sourcesHelp: 1
Number viewpointsHelp: 2
Complimentary wordsHelp: 7-9
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Leo Romero - Jul 27, 2008 - 8:59 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Dennis A. Abbott
4.2
by Dennis A. Abbott - Oct. 1, 2008

Book review of "Dire Predictions: Understanding Global Warming" by Michael E. Mann and Lee R. Kump. The reviewer makes this book sound like the answer to understanding the science behind the claims, as well as the solution to the problem of friends, relatives, and associates who don't understand science, and therefore believe the propaganda underwritten by Exxon-Mobil et al. Well-written, but the review would be taken more seriously if the reviewer gave his name instead of a blogger alias.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Leo Romero
3.0
by Leo Romero - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Norman Rogers
1.0
by Norman Rogers - Oct. 1, 2008

Michael Mann is the author of the propagandistic and inaccurate "hockey stick" graph that was misused by the IPCC, AL Gore and hundreds of others. It was throughly investigated and discredited by Steve McIntyre and the Wegman Report. Realclimate.org is a propagandistic site that accuses scientists who disagree of having mental problems. Read Roy Spencer's Climate Confusion to hear the other side of the argument.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.0

Average
from 5 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.1
Facts
3.5
Fairness
2.7
Information
3.2
Sourcing
2.7
Style
3.5
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
3.0
Context
3.0
Popularity
2.9
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
2.8
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!