Can The Liberal National Media Be Trusted To Report The Facts?

Barack Obama's trip to the Mideast and Europe last week briefly brought back to the nation's front pages something that's curiously been missing of late: the Iraq War.
. . . according to Andrew Tyndall, a media watchdog who monitors the Big Three TV newscasts, Iraq coverage was "massively scaled back this year."
Last year, when the war's outcome still seemed in doubt, the networks devoted 1,157 minutes to Iraq. That plunged to just 181 minutes in ... Full Story »

Posted by Gary North

See All Reviews »

Review

Randy Morrow
1.5
by Randy Morrow - Oct. 1, 2008

An article biased to the "neocon" point of view (i.e. things are going well--we are winning The war: in Iraq, against al-Qaida, and "on terror"). If as this article says:"It's pretty clear that the U.S. has won its war", then we should be able to begin large scale redeployment--but for some reason that is not happening. This article cites many things but does not source any of them.

See All Reviews »

Randy's Rating

Overall
1.5

Bad
from 12 answers
Quality
1.5
Facts
2.0
Fairness
1.0
Information
2.0
Sourcing
1.0
Style
2.0
Balance
1.0
Context
1.0
Popularity
1.5
Recommendation
2.0
Credibility
1.0
More How our ratings work »