So Much for the 'Looted Sites'

No one had bothered to challenge the reports, the evidence or the logic, not least because many ancient sites were in hostile terrain and couldn't be double-checked. By implication, the U.S. had been blamed for that too: After all, the presiding authority is effectively responsible for allowing no-go areas to exist where such things can occur. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala

See All Reviews »

Review

Allena Hansen
4.4
by Allena Hansen - Oct. 1, 2008

If all journalistic endeavor adhered to this standard, the public would be: 1. Extremely well-informed. 2. Excruciatingly bored. As close to a fair expression of a partisan issue as I've read. Moreover, it lead to an informative half-hour diversion researching the author's contextual use of "a priori." Excellent piece.

See All Reviews »

Allena's Rating

Overall
4.4

Good
from 7 answers
Quality
4.3
Fairness
5.0
Information
5.0
Sourcing
3.0
Context
4.0
Popularity
4.5
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
4.0
More How our ratings work »