Administration Wanted Loyalist As Justice Dept. Legal Adviser

Top Officials Sought to Defend Interrogation Practices

Then-Attorney General John D. Ashcroft offered the White House a list of five candidates to lead the Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel in early 2003, but top administration officials summarily rejected them in favor of installing a loyalist who would provide the legal footing needed to continue coercive interrogation techniques and broadly interpret executive power, according to two former administration officials. Full Story »

Posted by Beth Wellington
Tags Help
Stats Help
Number sourcesHelp: 2
Anonymous sourcesHelp: 2
Number viewpointsHelp: 2
Number stakeholdersHelp: 4
Stakeholders quotedHelp: 1
Derogatory wordsHelp: 0
Complimentary wordsHelp: 0
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Beth Wellington - Jul 17, 2008 - 10:30 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Jim Lang
4.0
by Jim Lang - Oct. 1, 2008

This is a well written and informative story with two sources, both of which are anonymous. Since both sources are still in the administration, their desire to remain anonymous can be understood; however, it does weaken an otherwise excellent story.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Kristin Gorski
3.2
by Kristin Gorski - Oct. 1, 2008

This well-written article is fascinating because it provides deep insight into everything the Bush camp needs to be concerned about right now—public discovery of the following: legal and ethical violations concerning treatment of enemy combatants, expansion of presidential power without Congressional approval, and skirting chains of command to extend a hidden agenda. However, the only sources for this article are two anonymous sources, former Bush administration officials, and it reads like a pivotal scene of a political thriller. The facts are so detailed that I believe their veracity; on the other hand, I want to know who is revealing these details, as it would lead more credence to what they're saying. This story was ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
David Dresser
3.7
by David Dresser - Oct. 1, 2008

This is another display of the arrogance and single-minded procedure used by the administration. Ashcroft had no taint of liberal thought about him but he was an honest and honorable man. He may have been guided by an excessive and narrow religious perspective, but he seems to have had great respect for law. The nation has not been well served by ignoring this particular piece of advice from this Attorney General.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Anthony Phillips
4.5
by Anthony Phillips - Oct. 1, 2008

Chilling reminder of what "Justice" has come to mean.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.9

Good
from 6 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.8
Fairness
3.6
Information
4.0
Sourcing
3.2
Context
4.0
Popularity
4.2
Recommendation
4.2
Credibility
4.6
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
3.4
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!