Obama to Set Higher Bar For Keeping State Secrets

The Obama administration will announce a new policy Wednesday making it much more difficult for the government to claim that it is protecting state secrets when it hides details of sensitive national security strategies such as rendition and warrantless eavesdropping, according to two senior Justice Department officials. Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins - via Craig Newmark, Ellen Miller, Memeorandum
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Derek Hawkins - Sep 23, 2009 - 6:28 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Derek Hawkins - Sep 23, 2009 - 8:02 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Christine Ahlstrom
3.3
by Christine Ahlstrom - Oct. 11, 2009

I didn't understand most of this story, to be honest. I don't know if it's because I don't know much about the subject matter, but I was still very confused about what had been decided about US secret keeping by the end of the article.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Derek Hawkins
3.6
by Derek Hawkins - Sep. 23, 2009

The policy, however, is unlikely to change the administration’s approach in two high-profile cases, including one in San Francisco filed by an Islamic charity whose ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Philip Kreck
3.8
by Philip Kreck - Sep. 24, 2009

This story deserves an above average rating. Unfortunately, it lost a few points for "fair" and "in-depth" because it failed to address some important questions: What are the possible negative consequences? Why wasn't this process adopted years ago? What are the counterarguments and the consequences of those counterarguments?

See Full Review » (10 answers)
Liz Lawyer
4.5
by Liz Lawyer - Sep. 24, 2009

First of all, it covers a relevant issue all people should take note of. It also puts the policy in context of current and previous administrations and how it will affect current litigation.

See Full Review » (4 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.7

Good
from 6 reviews (37% confidence)
Quality
3.7
Facts
4.7
Fairness
3.8
Sourcing
4.0
Style
3.5
Context
3.0
Depth
3.2
Enterprise
3.0
Relevance
4.0
Popularity
3.4
Recommendation
3.7
Credibility
3.2
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!