John Pilger: There Is a War on Journalism

(Multimedia) It's been a week since Rolling Stone published its article on General Stanley McChrystal that eventually led to him being fired by President Obama. Since the article came out, Rolling Stone and the reporter who broke the story, Michael Hastings, have come under attack in the mainstream media for violating the so-called "ground rules" of journalism. But the investigative journalist and documentary filmmaker John Pilger says Hastings was simply doing what ... Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu - via Tobie Openshaw (f)

See All Reviews »

Review

Vincent Caminiti
4.0
by Vincent Caminiti - Mar. 8, 2011

It would be very difficult to classify an article that unabashedly rips open the curtain concealing the "Wizard" as anything else but good journalism. The interview was focused, doesn't meander along commercially convenient by-ways or pull punches on 'underwritten' journalists that have for promises, power or payola put down their pens and began their reporting using pastels. The article leaves the reader disturbed and curious.

It is quite comical how different 'newsy' entities have reported on the Hastings' report to best suit their corporate appellation. Even the politically uninformed shills are having trouble figuring who's who, and while generally vociferous parroting their favorite 'newsy' personalities' arguments - this one has the usual suspects stymied, because their favorite pundits are disagreeing with each other and not even positing plausible arguments. Even the dangerously disengaged are seeing the family resemblance between the corporate news establishment and politicians and their seemingly identical penchant for BS.

See All Reviews »

Vincent's Rating

Overall
4.0

Good
from 19 answers
Quality
3.8
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Information
4.0
Insight
4.0
Style
3.0
Accuracy
3.0
Balance
4.0
Context
3.0
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
4.0
Expertise
3.0
Originality
5.0
Relevance
5.0
Transparency
4.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
4.5
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
4.0
More How our ratings work »