John Pilger: There Is a War on Journalism

(Multimedia) It's been a week since Rolling Stone published its article on General Stanley McChrystal that eventually led to him being fired by President Obama. Since the article came out, Rolling Stone and the reporter who broke the story, Michael Hastings, have come under attack in the mainstream media for violating the so-called "ground rules" of journalism. But the investigative journalist and documentary filmmaker John Pilger says Hastings was simply doing what ... Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu - via Tobie Openshaw (f)

See All Reviews »

Review

Jack Dinkmeyer
5.0
by Jack Dinkmeyer - Jun. 29, 2010

Although this television interview emphatically indicts the news media–turned “echo chambers for authority”–about their enthusiastic cheerleading for two wars Bushies started, it’s actually a condemnation of the entire infotainment-for-profits industry making a miserable failure masquerading as journalism. Far from sinning professionally, Michael Hastings is actually doing what journalists are supposed to do: namely hold politicians’ and others’ feet to the fire, and question and probe every idiotic statement–more plenteous today than every grain of sand on a thousand beaches. With the cooperation of all media, politicians are free to utter any crackbrained, off-the-wall statement their empty little minds can conjure. Because media censor their content by omission, Americans are in the dark about a plethora of important issues they have a legitimate right to know about. Thanks to circus, all Americans have is media snake-oil, smoke and mirrors.

The interview opens with a montage of media types condemning Rolling Stone, the gist of which removes all doubt about the credibility of the interview.

See All Reviews »

Jack's Rating

Overall
5.0

Very good
from 19 answers
Quality
5.0
Facts
5.0
Fairness
5.0
Information
5.0
Insight
5.0
Style
5.0
Accuracy
5.0
Balance
4.0
Context
5.0
Depth
5.0
Enterprise
5.0
Expertise
5.0
Originality
5.0
Relevance
5.0
Transparency
3.0
Responsibility
5.0
Popularity
5.0
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
5.0
More How our ratings work »