Bringing Down Bear Stearns: Politics & Power

On Monday, March 10, the rumor started: Bear Stearns was having liquidity problems. In fact, the maverick investment bank had around $18 billion in cash reserves. But soon the speculation created its own reality, and the race was on to keep Bear's crisis from ravaging Wall Street. With the blow-by-blow from insiders, Bryan Burrough follows the players--Bear's stunned executives, trigger-happy reporters at CNBC, a nervous Fed, a shadowy group of short-sellers--in what some believe was the greatest financial scandal in history.

...around 11...Bear's stock began to fall. It was then, questioning his trading desks downstairs, that Molinaro first heard the rumor: Bear was having liquidity troubles, Wall Street's way of saying the firm was running out of money. Molinaro made a face. This was crazy. There was no liquidity problem. Bear had about $18 billion in cash reserves.

Yet the whiff of gossip Molinaro heard that morning was the first tiny ripple in what within hours ... Full Story »

Posted by Beth Wellington
Tags Help
Subjects: Business
Topics: Finance
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Beth Wellington - Jul 5, 2008 - 10:22 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Naomi Isler
4.1
by Naomi Isler - Oct. 1, 2008

Wow! The writer seems to have really looked at this, and spoken with a lot of the key players. It's reminiscent of a lot of other 'economic' news - attacks on currencies that cause worldwide financial crises; small banks that fail causing medium ones to go down and forcing the Fed to step in before something really big goes belly up; mysterious moves in non NYSE venues that start stock trading up after crashes. Or how it's possible for very small numbers of people to bring down very big institutions and force major governmental actions - that's scary. Scarier than some of the CIA's manipulations.

See Full Review » (10 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.1

not enough reviews
from 2 reviews (20% confidence)
Quality
4.1
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Information
4.0
Style
5.0
Context
4.0
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »

Topics

(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!