Salmonella signs point to peppers

A likely source of jalepeno contamination is the water used to irrigate plants or wash peppers after they're picked, said Robert B. Gravani, a food science professor at Cornell University.

One health official involved in the investigation said "loose ends" are keeping tomatoes under suspicion, but the official said they could be accounted for easily. The official said evidence is "piling up" that indicates that jalapenos are to blame. Full Story »

Posted by Beth Wellington
Tags Help
Subjects: Health
Stats Help
Derogatory wordsHelp: 0
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Beth Wellington - Jul 5, 2008 - 9:47 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Denise Clendening
3.7
by Denise Clendening - Oct. 1, 2008

Article is an update on the 12th week (3 months) since salmonella was reported that may be related to tomatoes. Interesting information on how tomatoes were originally pinpointed as being the likely suspect - statistics. No contaminated tomatoes have been found. Hard to understand how after 3 months they cannot determine the source of the contamination. This story raises serious questions regarding food safety and reporting. Earlier this year the USDA kept saying no one became sick from eating meat from downed cows but one wonders how the government can say that if they cannot trace the source for food borne diseases. Included a link to the Center for Disease Control which indicates that at least one person has died from this ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Beth Wellington
4.0
by Beth Wellington - Oct. 1, 2008

Although the WSJ is getting credit for breaking the story, this reporter for the Baltimore Sun actually did. And his story is available online, whereas the Journal restricts access to its story.

See Full Review » (3 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.7

not enough reviews
from 2 reviews (20% confidence)
Quality
3.7
Facts
4.0
Fairness
3.0
Information
4.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
4.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
4.0
Context
3.0
Popularity
3.6
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
3.5
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
3.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help