Secretive Agency Under the Spotlight

Soon after accepting the post of CIA director two years ago, Michael V. Hayden set an unusual goal for his scandal-beset agency: virtual invisibility. Full Story »

Posted by Melva Hackney
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Melva Hackney - Jul 5, 2008 - 7:25 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Derek Hawkins - Jul 5, 2008 - 8:03 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Jeanne Roberts
2.5
by Jeanne Roberts - Oct. 1, 2008

It is clearly biased in favor of the CIA, thus not good news reporting.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
James Canning
2.5
by James Canning - Oct. 1, 2008

To me, the most interesting part of this piece came at the end, and touched on Hayden's efforts to improve relations with foreign intelligence services. I always keep in mind the fact that the CIA checked with French intelligence, regarding the possibility Iraq was trying to obtain yellowcake from Niger, and got back absolute confirmation there was no possiblity whatever that Iraq had sought to obtain uranium "from Africa" (as George W. Bush referred to it). This was before Joe Wilson was sent to Niger. The CIA also had thoroughly reviewed Iraqi family intelligence sources connected to the domestic armaments industry, and confirmed that Saddam Hussein had destroyed his MWD in the fall of 1991. This iinformation was kept from ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Seabury Lyon
4.0
by Seabury Lyon - Oct. 1, 2008

A good piece -as far as it went. What is missing, and perhaps beyond the intent of this one, is what is in motion to bring the CIA under more competent scrutiny to maximize fairness and effectiveness while minimizing screw-ups and abuses.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Melva Hackney
5.0
by Melva Hackney - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.4

Average
from 8 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.4
Facts
3.0
Fairness
3.2
Information
3.8
Sourcing
3.2
Style
3.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
3.0
Context
3.2
Popularity
3.7
Recommendation
3.5
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
4.0
# Views
4.4
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!