Preparing the Battlefield

Late last year, Congress agreed to a request from President Bush to fund a major escalation of covert operations against Iran, according to current and former military, intelligence, and congressional sources. These operations, for which the President sought up to four hundred million dollars, were described in a Presidential Finding signed by Bush, and are designed to destabilize the country's religious leadership. Full Story »

Posted by Harv Roth

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Dwight Rousu
4.7
by Dwight Rousu - Oct. 1, 2008

The article illuminates an administration out of control, hell bent upon attacking Iran, throwing money at terrorists to murder for the US, firing Fallon, eluding congressional oversight and eluding military oversight. The story provides facts that give a good reason for a pre-emptive strike in the form of impeaching these outlaws now as a clear and present danger, based upon their high crimes. Hersh does a super job of investigative reporting, again.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Mark Monday
4.2
by Mark Monday - Oct. 1, 2008

The author has a lengthy history of good reporting in areas that are murky, at best. While none of the readers have seen the documents or talked to his informants there is nothing in the public record that decisively contradicts his reporting. Until proven false, there is every reason to accept this piece as accurate.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Jack Dinkmeyer
5.0
by Jack Dinkmeyer - Oct. 1, 2008

I always find material by Seymour Hersh interesting and extremely accurate. Cheney’s and Bush’s potentially dangerous covert operations in Iran are clothed in the usual administration secrecy—kept even from those who should be in the loop. Concerning the breakdown between civilian and military communications, General John Sheehan: If you have small groups planning and conducting military operations outside the knowledge and control of the combatant commander…You end up with a disaster, like the reconstruction efforts in Iraq.’ One statement in the article sums it up: ‘Cheney has always wanted to go after Iran, and if he had more time he’d find a way to do it.’

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Denise Clendening
5.0
by Denise Clendening - Oct. 1, 2008

The latest detailed report from Hersh on the Bush administration's drum beat to war with Iran and the Democrats going along with it but at the same time not getting all the information on what they are funding. It is an outrage that we are funding the rendition of Iranians to Iraq for interrogation and funding organizations to destabilize the current government all over a 'belief' that Bush has that Iran is still working on nuclear weapons. He chooses not to believe the current inspection reports like he did in Iraq with devastating consequences and one wonders how he can be getting away with this again. Let's hope that the Democrats wake up and realize what they have funded and try to stop another unnecessary war. Hersch ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Harv Roth
4.9
by Harv Roth - Oct. 1, 2008

Seymour Hirsch is the most prominent investigative reporter we have in this country. In this story finely detailed with quotes gathered from interviews and sources within the government. Hirsch exposes the operation that are going on inside of Iran. These operations although funded by congress were limited in scope but the administration as ususal has different ideas. The fears of many prominent generals and including Sec Gates is that it will escalate into something we will not be able to control.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Robert Vermeers
4.1
by Robert Vermeers - Oct. 1, 2008

This lengthy analysis of the situation regarding our relationship with Iran is of the utmost importance to Americans as they asses the administration's dealing with Iran. It is my experience that most people who have opinions for or against the Iranian government should read more articles like this to get a better context for arguing one way or the other. I believe this is a well balanced article which could give support for either side of the argument about whether to take military action in Iran. From my perspective it supports a non-military approach; but I can believe that reasonable people with a different opinion could take information from the article to support them.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
James Canning
5.0
by James Canning - Oct. 1, 2008

All those wanting a better understanding of the absolute lunacy of Bush administration policy in the Middle East should read this story. Keep in mind that Iran helped to plan the US-led overthrow of the Taliban in Afghanistan, only to be rewarded with inclusion in the "Axis of Evil" by total boneheads in the Bush administration. The increasingly likely failure of the Afghan campaign owes no small part to the change of posture Iran adopted largely due to the imbecilic Bush administration efforts toward regime change. Remember, Iran offered to help with assessing the threat posed by Saddam Hussein ,and help with dealing with any such threat, but the fools controlling George W. Bush's decision-making spurned this offer and most ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Deborah Plummer
5.0
by Deborah Plummer - Oct. 1, 2008

Seymour Hersh has been "right-on" more often than not and this article explains what we're doing in Iran and our entire foreign policy by this example. We/US are supporting, in Iran, the same groups we're trying to capture/kill in Iraq/Afghanistan, who supposedly tried to kill us. Great logic ... not. But, we're being ruled by mad oil men. Mr. Hersh lays it all out explicitly the groups we're supporting and how Bush/Cheney funds these groups and our Congress is kept out of the loop. Excellent expose. But, it's too long of a report to get into mainstream media, I suppose, although the need is imperative.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Randy Morrow
4.8
by Randy Morrow - Oct. 1, 2008

A very informative article on another power grab by the Bush administration that may have very long ranging consequences not the least of which is the arming of militant groups including one described this way:“They are suspected of having links to Al Qaeda and they are also thought to be tied to the drug culture.”

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Shawn McConnell
4.9
by Shawn McConnell - Oct. 1, 2008

Hersh is possibly the most dependable and trustworthy investigative journalist working today. He once again seems to have dug up important facts on U.S. foreign policy that no other journalist has been able to find (or has attempted to find). In a perfect world we would read stories such as this in the morning paper daily.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Richard McIlnay
5.0
by Richard McIlnay - Oct. 1, 2008

Seymour goes to the heart of the story, marshals his quoptes, gives his sources, and allows the reader to reach his/her own conclusion. One part of the problem is the Democrats going along with his 'russian roulette.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.8

Very good
from 18 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.8
Facts
4.9
Fairness
4.9
Information
4.9
Sourcing
4.7
Style
4.8
Accuracy
5.0
Balance
4.4
Context
4.9
Popularity
4.4
Recommendation
4.9
Credibility
4.3
# Reviews
5.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!