Citing Need for Assessments, U.S. Freezes Solar Energy Projects

Faced with a surge in the number of proposed solar power plants, the federal government has placed a moratorium on new solar projects on public land until it studies their environmental impact, which is expected to take about two years.... But the decision to freeze new solar proposals temporarily, reached late last month, has caused widespread concern in the alternative-energy industry, as fledgling solar companies must wait to see if they can realize ... Full Story »

Posted by Terry Gamble

See All Reviews »

Review

David Dresser
3.7
by David Dresser - Oct. 1, 2008

If the reader knows nothing about these issues this story will not fully inform. The differences between photovoltaic and concentrating are critical. PV plants can be small, placed on top of buildings, locally funded and have very little environmental impact. The huge concentrators have the problem of any huge construction. Regardless of that, these are viable ways to go forward with much less problem than nuclear. There is no such thing as "wasteland" so there is no place that big things can be built that don't bother someone or some thing. Windmills have had to evolve because earlier ones devastated birds, were seen by some as ugly (or worse) and often could not be located where most needed. That is getting better and concentrators will get better, but all of these things require lots of money and only governments can find that funding. This nation gives incredible amounts of money to nuclear generation and to coal. The Manhattan Project and the Space Race would have gotten nowhere without federal monies.

See All Reviews »

David's Rating

Overall
3.7

Good
from 7 answers
Quality
3.5
Fairness
4.0
Information
3.0
Sourcing
3.0
Context
4.0
Popularity
4.5
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
4.0
More How our ratings work »