A generally balanced and informative story, but part of the context was omitted...perhaps because of editorial decisions on how much space to devote to this article. It is true that McCain has gamed the system to his advantage. His name was placed on the ballot in Ohio based on his declaration that he would participate in the government funding program. In fact, his campaign even borrowed money against the government-guaranteed money. McCain subsequently talked as if he had never made any such commitment and apparently decided to take the money only when it became clear that he could not have raised as much as the gov't $84 M. Then, of course, McCain has been busy raising money for the RNC which has essentially no limits on ... More »

This article was written from the perspective of an alien. I like that. It assumed the reader knew nothing. While I struggle with the lack of a singular writing style - all the information was there. The article left one to either find out more - or - if they were already knowledgeable of the subject - find an time efficient update without insignificant details. The efficiency and the neutrality of the article were very impressive. There was also, an interesting overview of what's to come by positioning the two candidates arguing points and potential campaign lines for the future.

Amazing that there is no mention of McCain's recent problem with the FEC and the DNC suing him next week in US District Court over his withdrawing from public financing to fund his election up to the convention after he agreed to it. This was in the AP this week and many stories earlier this year. Here is a link to the recent AP article http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5joC4LlcZVm5kR-hSO7HEOm4ns-1wD91C0RPO2

seems a bit slanted against Obama

I was looking for the statement Obama "pledged" or "promised" which is the talking point I hear most frequently. I felt the article use of "turnabout" was a good neutral description. including the background and additions to the questionnaire offered needed facts. I too feel at least a passing reference to McCain's campaign finance troubles should have been included.

A sad commentary on "dirty tricks" politics making it necessary to have practically unlimited funds to defend yourself. Naturally, Mr McCain proved the necessity of this move even as he decried it!

Yes. The facts came from original souces and are quoted correctly. I would have liked to have seen the piece of paper John Mccain refers to so it is made very clear as to what it is Obama signed. Otherwise I was quite satisfied that this piece covered the necessary elemnt of this story as a whole.

He is forgoing funds because he is believed to be a true Muslim. I ask 2 questions!! 1. Has anyone ever heard this guy repeat our National Anthem? 2. Is he going to place his hand on The BIBLE to be sworn into the presidents office? We have seen he doesn't put his hand over his heart. If he uses the Bible every Muslim will hate him and want to kill him. If he uses the Koran then he is Muslim and we are doomed as the bible predicts. Bye, Bye wonderful freedoms!! Earl