Barack Obama and free trade: Economic vandalism

You can be fairly sure that when a government slips an announcement out at nine o’clock on a Friday night, it is not proud of what it is doing. That is one of the only things that makes sense about Barack Obama’s decision to break a commitment he, along with other G20 leaders, reaffirmed last April: to avoid protectionist measures at a time of great economic peril. In every other way the president’s decision to slap a 35% tariff on imported Chinese ... Full Story »

Posted by Fabrice Florin
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Fabrice Florin - Sep 18, 2009 - 10:42 PM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Fabrice Florin - Sep 18, 2009 - 11:41 PM PDT
Vincent Caminiti
2.1
by Vincent Caminiti - Sep. 20, 2009

This article, an opinion piece, called on the author's opinion for research as well as its object. It is contains a large amount of rhetoric that could be applied to any anti-Obama article and then re-purposed to provide a shell for the tariff subject. It is a nonsense article. It discusses no possible motives for the unpopular opinion and it cites none of the proponents of the action. It is a factory spec fear piece, neglecting what could be valuable objections.

I'm not in agreement with the Obama administrations moves as it regards the tariff on China tires. That being said - a good point is often marred by a bad argument - this is a bad argument because it is boiler plate anti-Obama talking points with the tire tariff controversy pasted into a pre-fabricated article. (Emphasis on fabricated)

Mr Bush’s tariffs, like the Reagan-era export restraints on Japanese cars and semiconductors, came from a president who was fundamentally committed to free trade. Mr ... More »

See Full Review » (21 answers)
Fabrice Florin
4.0
by Fabrice Florin - Sep. 18, 2009

Infomative analysis of President Obama’s decision to impose a 35% tariff on imported Chinese tires. This article gives a reasonable opinion on how this affects the G20's goal to avoid protectionist measures during the economic crisis. An insightful read, citing factual evidence from credible sources, with helpful context.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Fred Gatlin
2.8
by Fred Gatlin - Sep. 19, 2009

This article assumes that free trade does not include any concerns about wage differences or sales below costs. Perhaps it is time to reconsider manufacturing as well as banking. Perhaps addressing an issue on Friday afternoon is intended to give journalism time more time to think broadly.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Laer Haider
1.5
by Laer Haider - Sep. 19, 2009

This article presents a very right-wing, wrong-headed view of geopolitics and how the global economy functions. As other nations continually increase tariffs while the US keeps reducing or eliminating them, we continue to force industry off our lands and into foreign pockets. Well-paying manufacturing jobs continue to vanish, eroding the ability of our economic foundation--We the People--to purchase goods and services. Supply-side economics is now a proven failure. Demand-side economics is a long-proven success. It's about time we begin returning to it.

See Full Review » (5 answers)
Leon
4.1
by Leon - Sep. 19, 2009

The only thing I would add to this article is to use the comparison of Hoover and what he did during the Great Depression. Basically, Obama is following the MISTAKES of that administration. Protectionism is NOT the way out of our economic problems, it's actually right back in to them. So why would you do this, Mr. President?

See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.1

Average
from 7 reviews (56% confidence)
Quality
3.0
Facts
3.6
Fairness
3.1
Information
3.0
Insight
3.0
Sourcing
3.4
Style
2.7
Accuracy
2.0
Balance
1.0
Context
2.8
Depth
2.7
Enterprise
1.7
Expertise
2.0
Originality
3.0
Relevance
2.3
Transparency
2.0
Responsibility
3.0
Popularity
3.3
Recommendation
3.1
Credibility
4.2
# Reviews
3.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

  • On eve of G-20, report says protectionism rampant and could increase even as economies recover

    () WASHINGTON - The world's major powers are repeatedly breaking their pledges not to erect trade barriers, and there's no sign the "protectionist juggernaut" will ease as ...
    Posted by Fabrice Florin
  • A shift in gear

    () Amid queries on state aid and competition, the deal brokered by Germany to save carmaker Opel has raised the problem of how the EU handles a slowing but still significant sector
    Posted by Fabrice Florin
  • Barack Obama and free trade: Economic vandalism

    YOU can be fairly sure that when a government slips an announcement out at nine o’clock on a Friday night, it is not proud of what it is doing. That is one of the only ...
    Posted by Kaizar Campwala
  • Tired Protectionism

    () After President Obama decided to impose a 35 percent tariff on Chinese-made tires, China reacted angrily and predictably: threatening to impose its own tariffs on American ...
    Posted by Fabrice Florin